About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

86 Nw. U. L. Rev. 700 (1991-1992)
My Way and the Highway: The Law and Economics of Choice of Forum Clauses in Consumer Form Contracts

handle is hein.journals/illlr86 and id is 720 raw text is: Copyright 1992 by Northwestern University, School of Law          Printed in U.S.A.
Northwestern University Law Review                                  Vol. 86, No. 3
PUBLIC POLICY
MY WAY AND THE HIGHWAY: THE LAW AND
ECONOMICS OF CHOICE OF FORUM
CLAUSES IN CONSUMER FORM
CONTRACTS
Lee Goldman
I. INTRODUCTION
Parties entering into contractual relations seek to reduce and allo-
cate risks. One type of provision that may achieve these goals is the fo-
rum selection clause. Such a clause stipulates that any litigation arising
from the contract must be brought exclusively in a designated forum.
The clause reduces uncertainty and the risk of litigation over the proper
forum for suit should unforeseen problems develop. The chosen forum,
however, may not be equally convenient to both parties to the contract.
Nevertheless, the costs of litigating in the forum are allocated in advance
and this allocation may be reflected in the contract price.
For some parties, the use of forum selection clauses is so convenient
that they prefer to include them in every transaction they enter. By guar-
anteeing that all litigation is in the same state, not only is predictability
enhanced, but efficiencies may be created through consolidation of ac-
tions and reliance on the same local counsel. By including such clauses
in standard form contracts, transaction costs are reduced.
The law has recognized the obvious benefits of forum selection
clauses by routinely endorsing their use.1 A conflict arises, however,
when one party to the transaction lacks full information and equal bar-
gaining power. In particular, when such clauses are included in standard
form consumer contracts there are reasons to believe neither the parties'
1 See, e.g., M/S Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 (1972); Moses v. Business Card
Express, 929 F.2d 1131 (6th Cir. 1991); Northwestern Nat'l Ins. Co. v. Donovan, 916 F.2d 372 (7th
Cir. 1990); Heller Fin. v. Midwhey Powder Co., 883 F.2d 1286 (7th Cir. 1989); Instrumentation
Assocs. v. Madsen Elec., 859 F.2d 4 (3d Cir. 1988); Manetti-Farrow, Inc. v. Gucci Am., 858 F.2d
509 (9th Cir. 1988); Hodes v. S.N.C. Achille Lauro ed Altri-Gestione, 858 F.2d 905 (3d Cir. 1988),
cert. dismissed, 490 U.S. 1001 (1989); In re Diaz Contracting, Inc., 817 F.2d 1047 (3d Cir. 1987);
Hoffman v. Natl Equip. Rental, 643 F.2d 987 (2d Cir. 1981); Lexington Inv. Co. v. Southwest
Stainless, Inc., 697 F. Supp. 139 (S.D.N.Y. 1988); Wilkinson v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc., 645 F.
Supp. 318 (S.D. Tex. 1985); LFC Lessors, Inc. v. Pearson, 585 F. Supp. 1362 (D. Mass. 1984);
Gaskin v. Stumm Handel GmbH, 390 F. Supp. 361 (S.D.N.Y. 1975).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most