About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

53 Seton Hall L. Rev. 667 (2022-2023)
White Christian Nationalism Enters the Political Mainstream: Implications for the Roberts Court and Religious Freedom

handle is hein.journals/shlr53 and id is 670 raw text is: 













    White  Christian  Nationalism Enters the Political
 Mainstream: Implications for the Roberts Court and
                    Religious   Freedom



                       Stephen M. Feldman*

INTRODUCTION  ....................................................................................667
I. THE DEVELOPMENT  OF POLITICAL CONSERVATISM.........................673
      A. Neoliberalism.......................................................................674
      B. White Christian Nationalism...............................................678
          1. Origins ...........................................................................679
          2. Two Threads..................................................................682
          3. Relationship with Democracy.......................................689
      C. Deeper into the Political Mainstream................................692
          1. The End of the Cold War .............................................694
          2. September 11 Terrorist Attacks on the Twin Towers .699
          3. The Election of Barack Obama....................................700
          4. The Election of Donald Trump ...................................701
          5. Republican Conservatism Today..................................712
II. POLITICAL CONSERVATISM AND RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
      UNDER THE ROBERTS  COURT  ....................................................722
      A. Introduction ........................................................................722
      B. Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania......................729
III. CONCLUSION .................................................................................741


                        INTRODUCTION
    An  increasing number of legal scholars and political scientists
acknowledge that, in most cases, Supreme Court decision-making is
based on neither pure law nor pure politics.1 Rather, the justices' votes


* Jerry W. Housel/Carl F. Arnold Distinguished Professor of Law and Adjunct Profes-
sor of Political Science, University of Wyoming
   1 See MICHAEL A. BAILEY & FORREST MALTZMAN, THE CONSTRAINED COURT: LAW,
POLITICS, AND THE DECISIONS JUSTICES MAXE 15-16, 65-66 (2011); CHARLES GARDNER


667

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most