About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

61 J. Crim. L. Criminology & Police Sci. 152 (1970)
Reparation or Restitution by the Criminal Offender to His Victim: Applicability of an Ancient Concept in the Modern Correctional Process

handle is hein.journals/jclc61 and id is 160 raw text is: THE JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW, CRIMINOLOGY AND POLICE SCIENCE
Copyright @ 1970 by Northwestern University School of Law

Vol. 81, No. 2
Printed in U.S.A.

REPARATION OR RESTITUTION BY THE CRIMINAL OFFENDER TO HIS
VICTIM: APPLICABILITY OF AN ANCIENT CONCEPT IN THE
MODERN CORRECTIONAL PROCESS
BRUCE R. JACOB*

I. INTRODUCTION
In theory victims of crime have for centuries had
available to them the civil remedy of a tort action
against persons who have wronged them through
the commission of crime. In practice, however,
this remedy is in most instances of little value.
In many cases the offender is unknown; or where
he is known, the victim often cannot afford the
expense, in terms of money and time, of bringing
a law suit against the offender.' In addition, since
perpetrators of violent crimes are typically poor
or financially destitute,2 a judgment against such
offenders would be uncollectible. Moreover, if con-
victed and imprisoned, an offender's incarceration
merely serves to compound his destitute condition
for as a rule inmates of today's prisons are able to
earn very little, if any, money during their con-
finement8
During the last decade there has developed
throughout the world an increased interest in
legislation to provide monetary indemnification to
* B.A., J.D., LL.M., Assistant and Associate Pro-
fessor, Emory University School of Law, 1965-69;
Research Associate, Center for Criminal Justice, and
S.I.D. Candidate (Harvard).
This paper was submitted to Professor Lloyd E.
Ohin of the Harvard Law School, for the course on
Crime and Society, given in the Fall semester, 1968.
The author gratefully acknowledges Professor Ohlin's
guidance and encouragement.
IWolfgang, Victim Compensation in Crimes of Per-
sonal Violence, 50 MINN. L. Rxv. 223 (1965).
2HomaE OFICE,l COMPENSATON FOR VICTIMs OF
Cmnes oF VIOLENCE, CMND. No. 1406, at 2 (1961);
Geis, State Compensation to Victims of Violent Crime,
PRESmENT'S ComMIssIoN ON LAW ENFORC      ENT AND
ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, TASK FORCE REPORT:
CRM AND ITS ImPACT--Ax AssEssmrEN 157, 159
(1967); Mueller, Compensation for Victims of Crime:
Thought Before Action, 50 MNN. L. REv. 213, 220,
n. 25 (1965).
3 It has been estimated, for example, that ninety
percent or more of the inmates of the United States
penitentiary in Atlanta, the largest of the correctional
institutions in the federal system (and one of the better
institutions in America from the standpoint of provid-
ing wage-earning opportunities to inmates), are indi-
gent in the sense that they would not have or be able
to raise as much as $300 to retain legal counsel. Inter-
view with Mr. Lee Jett, Jr., Chief of Classification and
Parole, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia,
December, 1966.

victims of crime, particularly victims of crimes of
violence.4 This recent concern for the plight of
crime victims is largely attributable to the writings
of Margery Fry, an English penal reformer, who
set forth her views in a book and a newspaper
article published during the 1950's. Miss Fry had
originally been interested in the possibility of
requiring that reparation be made by the criminal
offender to his victim as part of the process of
reforming or rehabilitating the offender.' Due to
the practical difficulties inherent in such an ap-
proach she later became disenchanted with this
idea and instead advocated that society should
assume this obligation and compensate victims of
crime as a matter of social welfare policy.' All of
the victim-indemnification plans adopted in recent
years in New Zealand,7 Great Britain8 and the
United States9 have been designed primarily to
provide compensation rather than reparation'
or restitution. As used in the following discussion,
the term compensation will refer to payment made
from state funds to victims of crime. The words
reparation and restitution signify payment made
by the criminal offender to his victim as indem-
nification for the harm or injury caused by the
crime, reparation being a broader term which
seems to include the concept of restitution.?
4 See generally Compensation to Victims of Crime of
Personal Violence: An examination of the Scope of the
Problem: A Symposium, 50 MINN. L. REV. 211 (1965).
5 M. FRY, THE ARms OF THE LAW 126 (1951).
6 Fry, Justice for Victims, The Observer (London),
July 7, at 8, 1957, col. 2, reprinted in Compensation for
Victims of Criminal Violence, 8 J. PuB. L. 191, 192-93
(1959); see also Geis, supra note 2 at 160.
See Cameron, Compensation for Victims of Crimes of
Violence, The New Zealand Experiment, 12 J. PUB. L.
367 (1963).
SHOME OFFICE & ScoTmis    HOME OFFICE, Comr-
PENSATION FOR VICTIMS OF CRIMEs OF VIOLENCE,
CmNoD. No. 2323 (1964).
8 Such plans have been adopted in California, New
York, Maryland, Massachusetts, and Hawaii. See e.g.
CAL. PEN. CODE §§13600-03 (West 1965); CAL.
WELFARE & INsT'NS CODE §11211 (West 1965).
10 According to WEBSTER'S THIRD INTERNATIONAL
DICTIONARY 1923, 1936 (Unabridged, 1966) the words
reparation and restitution have quite similar
meanings. Both mean the act of restoring. Repara-
52

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most