About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

15 U. Pa. J. Bus. L. 797 (2012-2013)
Arthur Andersen and the Myth of the Corporate Death Penalty: Corporate Criminal Convictions in the Twenty-First Century

handle is hein.journals/upjlel15 and id is 809 raw text is: ARTHUR ANDERSEN AND THE MYTH OF THE CORPORATE DEATH PENALTY: CORPORATE CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY Gabriel Markoff* ABSTRACT The conventional wisdom states that prosecuting corporations can subject them to terrible collateral consequences that risk putting them out of business and causing massive social and economic harm. According to this viewpoint, which has come to dominate the literature following the demise of Arthur Andersen after that firm's prosecution in the wake of the Enron scandal, even a criminal indictment can be a corporate death penalty. The Department of Justice (DOJ) has implicitly accepted this view by declining to prosecute many large companies in favor of using criminal settlements called deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs). Yet, there is no evidence to support the existence of the Andersen Effect and the much-hyped corporate death penalty. Indeed, no one has ever empirically studied what happens to companies after conviction. In this Article, I do just that. Using the database of organizational convictions made publicly available by Professor Brandon Garrett, I find that no *Law Clerk to the Honorable Gregg Costa, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Texas (2012-2013). J.D., Class of 2012, The University of Texas School of Law, All views and opinions expressed within are my own and should not be taken to reflect the position of any other individual or entity. I wish to extend my thanks to Barry McNeil and Stacy Brainin, for their invaluable instruction; to Brandon Garrett, for his advice, freely given, and his extraordinary dataset, generously shared; to Mike Koehler, for his assistance in navigating the submissions process; and to the Honorable Gregg Costa, for his encouragement and guidance. To Tansy Woan and the staff of the University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law, I thank you for your excellent work. Thanks go also to Keith Cohan, Monica Gaudioso, Alex Hughes, Lisa Kinzer, Nicole LeFave, Josh Packman, George Padis, Drew Pennebaker, Jeff Quilici, Sean Thompson, Kate Wagner, Colin Watterson, and Eric Werlinger, who know what they did. Finally, to Ein: All my love.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most