About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

116 Mich. L. Rev. 581 (2017-2018)
Grasping for Energy Democracy

handle is hein.journals/mlr116 and id is 619 raw text is: GRASPING FOR ENERGY DEMOCRACY
Shelley Welton*
Until recently, energy law has attracted relatively little citizen participation.
Instead, Americans have preferred to leave matters of energy governance to
expert bureaucrats. But the imperative to respond to climate change presents
energy regulators with difficult choices over what our future energy sources
should be, and how quickly we should transition to them-choices that are
outside traditional regulatory expertise. For example, there are currently ro-
bust nationwide debates over what role new nuclear power plants and hydrau-
lically fractured natural gas should play in our energy mix, and over how to
maintain affordable energy for all while rewarding those who choose to put
solar panels on their roofs. These questions are far less technical and more
value laden than most of the questions energy bureaucrats faced in the past.
Consequently, these issues have provoked a growing call for the democratiza-
tion of energy law, so that the field might better inject Americans' preferences
and goals into decisions over energy policy.
But exactly how the democratization of energy law might proceed remains
unclear. Indeed, the concept of energy democracy has taken on significantly
different-and frequently conflicting-meanings in debates over energy law
reform. This Article argues that the lack of clarity over the meaning of energy
democracy presents a troubling hurdle to the burgeoning project of democra-
tizing energy law, as different conceptions of the term demand divergent legal
reforms. To make this case, it first identifies three distinct conceptions of en-
ergy democracy in discussions of energy law reform: consumer choice, local
control, and access to process. It then explains how each of these visions coun-
sels for a different set of regulatory reforms, which instantiate distinct
processes for channeling citizen preferences about the future of our energy sys-
tem. As regulators choose among these visions, it is imperative that they un-
derstand the stakes of embracing any particular conception of energy
democracy. This Article advances that endeavor by tying the rhetoric of en-
ergy democracy to concrete proposals for reform, and evaluating what each
portends for the democratization of energy law. It concludes with a note of
caution about too swiftly embracing consumer choice or local control,
since each risks narrowing modes of participation in ways that may diminish
from a robust conversation about the grid-wide changes needed in U.S. energy
supply.
* Assistant Professor, University of South Carolina School of Law. Thanks to Holly
Doremus, Sean Kammer, Amanda Shanor, Doug Kysar, Al Klevorick, Susan Rose-Ackerman,
Dan Esty, Josh Eagle, Ned Snow, Eric Biber, Alice Kaswan, Nathan Richardson, Nick Parrillo,
and participants in the University of Washington School of Law's June 2016 Junior
Environmental Law Scholars Workshop, the PUC-Clean Energy Collaborative's Fall 2016
Workshop at UNC-Chapel Hill, the Yale Law School Ph.D. in Law Workshop, UC-Berkeley's
Spring 2017 Environmental Law Colloquium, and Sharon Jacobs's Spring 2017 Advanced
Energy Law Seminar at Colorado Law for comments on various drafts.

581

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most