About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

72 Stan. L. Rev. 841 (2020)
America's Hidden Foster Care System

handle is hein.journals/stflr72 and id is 870 raw text is: ARTICLE
America's Hidden Foster Care System
Josh Gupta-Kagan*
Abstract. In most states, child protection agencies induce parents to transfer physical
custody of their children to kinship caregivers by threatening to place the children in
foster care and bring them to family court. Both the frequency of these actions (this Article
establishes that they occur tens or even hundreds of thousands of times annually) and their
impact (they separate parents and children, sometimes permanently) resemble the formal
foster care system. But they are hidden from courts, because agencies file no petition
alleging abuse or neglect, and hidden from policymakers, because agencies do not
generally report these cases.
While informal custody changes can sometimes serve children's and families' interests by
preventing the need for state legal custody, this hidden foster care system raises multiple
concerns, presciently raised in Supreme Court dicta in 1979 in Miller v. Youakim. State
agencies infringe on parents' and children's fundamental right to family integrity with few
meaningful due process checks. Agencies avoid legal requirements to make reasonable
efforts to reunify parents and children, licensing requirements intended to ensure that
kinship placements are safe, and requirements to provide foster care maintenance
payments to kinship caregivers.
This Article explains how the present child protection funding system and recent federal
financing reforms further incentivize hidden foster care without regulating it. Moreover,
relatively recent state statutes and policies codify the practice without providing much
regulation. In contrast to this trend, this Article argues for regulation: the opportunity for
a parent to challenge the need for the custody change in court, limits on the length of time
such custody changes can remain in effect without more formal action, the provision of
counsel to parents (using money made available by a separate recent change in federal
child protection funding), and requirements for states to report cases in which their
actions lead to parent-child separations.

841

* Associate Professor, University of South Carolina School of Law. Thank you to Christopher
Church, Michael Dsida, Martin Guggenheim, Avni Gupta-Kagan, Lisa Martin, Angie
Schwartz, and Emily Suski for helpful comments on earlier drafts, and to Kendall Eoute
and Hunter Williams for excellent research assistance.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most