About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

40 Law Tchr. 203 (2006)
Reform of Police Powers: The Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005

handle is hein.journals/lwtch40 and id is 213 raw text is: 







RECENT LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS


               Editors: Edwina Higgins and Laura Tatham

            CRIME/POLICE POWERS: REFORM OF POLICE
          POWERS: THE SERIOUS ORGANISED CRIME AND
                           POLICE ACT 2005

THE SERIOUS Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 (SOCPA) may not
sound like a statute that will introduce general reform of police powers but
that is what it has done. The main focus of this note is on powers of arrest,
with search and detention also considered; other issues such as
photographing suspects and the more specialist material on serious
organised crime are not considered. The provisions described below, in
relation to arrest and search, came into force on 1st January 2006. The
police will now be able to arrest for any offence, whilst citizens will only be
able to arrest for indictable offences (it is important to note that this
includes offences triable either way). It is the powers of the police that
receive attention here as citizen's arrest is of limited practical importance.


                        The new powers of arrest

Section 110 of SOCPA provides for a new section 24 of the Police and
Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) and section 25 of PACE is repealed. The
concepts that were in section 25 are now contained within the new section
24. This is really only a simplification of the existing police powers of arrest
and is not, as some commentators have suggested, an extension of them.
Indeed, the powers of arrest could be said to have been more tightly
controlled. Necessity criteria are provided in section 24 in relation to the
new section 24 powers and these will have to be adhered to in relation to
all offences. However, some old concepts have disappeared including the
notions of an arrestable offence and a serious arrestable offence.
   Matters are different, however, as we shall see, in relation to powers of
search and detention. In these cases, there is no doubt that police powers
have been extended, in what can be seen as a general move in recent years
from due process to crime control in relation to the criminal justice system.
Earlier manifestations of this include attempts to restrict access to jury trial,
the eroding of the presumption in favour of bail, double jeopardy and
allowing previous convictions to be introduced where the offence is of the
same category or description.
   The new system of arrest powers involves the abolition of many of the
statutory powers of arrest, such as that in the Public Order Act 1986 (and
with it the requirement for the police to be in uniform in order to arrest).
We are left with only the following statutory powers: for being over the


203

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most