About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

15 Afr. Hum. Rts. L.J. 329 (2015)
The Challenges of Adjudicating Presidential Election Disputes in Domestic Courts in Africa

handle is hein.journals/afrhurlj15 and id is 345 raw text is: 









  AFRICAN HUMAN RIGHTS LAW JOURNAL
  To cite: 0 Kaaba 'The challenges of adjudicating presidential election disputes in domestic courts in
              Africa' (2015) 15 African Human Rights Law Journal 329-354
                http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1996-2096/2015/vl 5n2a5



The challenges of adjudicating

presidential election disputes in

domestic courts in Africa



O'Brien Kaaba
Doctoral candidate, University of South Africa


Summary
Defective and fraudulent elections are common in Africa. Although there
has been some improvement since the democratic wave of the 1980s and
1990s, sham elections are still prevalent across the continent. Where
elections have been assailed with anomalies and results are disputed, as is
often the case in Africa, aggrieved parties have looked to the judiciary as
an institution of last hope to seek redress. The judiciary has, however,
almost always decided presidential election disputes in common patterns
that militate against the growth of democracy on the continent. The
common patterns are that all cases are decided in favour of the status
quo; many cases are dismissed on flimsy technical and procedural rules
without consideration of the merits; there is misuse of the substantial
effect rule to uphold defective elections; there are delays in determining
cases; and judges refrain from making any reasonable decisions. The
judiciary in Africa may, therefore, be fully complicit in the delayed
consolidation of electoral democracy on the continent.

Key words: Adjudication; election disputes; Africa; courts; presidential
elections; democracy









    LLB (London), LLM (Zambia); okaaba@yahoo.com. This article is based in part on
    my LLD research at the University of South Africa. I would like to express my
    gratitude to my academic supervisor, Dr Fagbayibo Babatunde, for his guidance
    and encouragement.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most