About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

69 Juv. & Fam. Ct. J. 55 (2018)
Relative Placement: The Best Answer for Our Foster Care System

handle is hein.journals/juvfc69 and id is 193 raw text is: 












    Relative Placement: The Best Answer for Our

                            Foster Care System



                               By Judge   Leonard  Edwards


                                     ABSTRACT


           This article briefly traces the history of the placement of children out of their
      homes  because of parental abuse or neglect. The preference for relative placement is a
      recent occurrence. The advantages of relative placement instead of foster or group
      care are summarized as well as the disadvantages. Relative placement rates across the
      country are about  32%.  Several jurisdictions have much higher placement rates
      including Allegheny County,  Pennsylvania. Los Angeles, California, is experiment-
      ing with social work practices that have produced over 80% relative placement rates
      during the past year. How both of these jurisdictions accomplish high relative place-
      ment  rates is described in detail. Judges should persuade their own social service
      agencies to adopt these practices.


Key  words:  Foster care, Relative Placement.

                                      HISTORY


      When   the  juvenile court removes  a child from        parental care because of abuse or
neglect, what  type of placement   best meets his or her needs?  In the United  States, the
answer  to this question has evolved for more than a century.






      Judge Leonard Edwards  is a retired judge from the Santa Clara County, California, Superior Court
where he served for 26 years. Judge Edwards is now a mentor, teacher, and writer whose writings can be seen
on his website: judgeleonardedwards.com. He is a former president of the NCJFCJ and has made invited
presentations in 48 states and 13 foreign countries.
      The author is thankful for the information gathered from the two Los Angeles pilot projects and the
cooperation from Regional Administrators Jennifer Lopez (Santa Fe Springs Office) and Aris S. Banico, M.A.
(Glendora Regional Office). The author acknowledges the advocacy efforts of Judge Michael Nash (ret.), now
the Director of the Office of Child Protection in Los Angeles for his long-standing support of relative place-
ment. The author is also grateful for the assistance provided by Corby Sturges from the Center for Families,
Children & the Courts, a division of the California Judicial Council, from Rob Waring, a Managing
Attorney representing children in Alameda County, and Sidney Hollar, Esq., a practicing attorney in San
Francisco.

Juvenile and Family Court Journal 69. No. 3 5 5
C 2018 National Council ofjuvenile and Familj Court judges

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most