About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

87 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 706 (2019)
Standing on Shaky Ground: How Circuit Courts Reconcile Legal Rights and Injuries in Face after Spokeo v. Robins

handle is hein.journals/gwlr87 and id is 752 raw text is: 







                                  NOTE













    Standing on Shaky Ground: How Circuit Courts
    Reconcile Legal Rights and Injuries in Fact After
                           Spokeo v. Robins



                             James   Hannaway*


                                  ABSTRACT

        In Spokeo  v. Robins, the Supreme Court attempted to resolve a tension
    that has existed since the birth of modem Article III standing. On one hand,
    Congress  has always been able to create legal rights, the invasion of which
    creates standing to sue. On the other hand, to satisfy the case-or-controversy
    requirement of Article III, a plaintiff always needs to allege an injury in fact,
    which exists independent of the law. Before Spokeo, the Court offered contra-
    dictory answers as to whether Congress can create legal rights which would
    suffice, in and of themselves, to create an injury in fact every time a plaintiff
    alleged the violation of his or her legal rights. In Spokeo, the Court muddied
    the waters even more. This Note conducts a content analysis of circuit court
    decisions in the wake of Spokeo to show that courts find Congress's judgment
    relevant to injury-in-fact analysis in a majority of cases. This Note surveys
    how  courts use various tools of statutory interpretation to determine Con-
    gress's judgment, then suggests a uniform framework for injury-in-fact analy-
    sis that can achieve sensible and consistent results.


    *  J.D., The George Washington University Law School. Many thanks to Molly Rucki,
Charles Davis, Eun Hee Han, Alan B. Morrison, Jonathan R. Siegel, and Robert L. Glicksman
for their insightful comments during the drafting of this Note, and to Katelyn Whitfield and the
associates and members of The George Washington Law Review for their thoughtful edits. The
author would like to dedicate this piece to his late father, John Hannaway (J.D. 1983). All errors
are the author's alone.

May 2019 Vol. 87 No. 3


706

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most