About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

35 Wis. Int'l L.J. 458 (2017-2018)
Necessary Check Points or Immovable Roadblocks: Accessing the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights

handle is hein.journals/wisint35 and id is 470 raw text is: 






      NECESSARY CHECK POINTS OR IMMOVABLE
 ROADBLOCKS? ACCESSING THE AFRICAN COURT ON
                HUMAN AN PEOPLES' RIGHTS

                          OLIVER WrNDRTDGE*

                               ABSTRACT

        The African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights is in many
ways an ideal destination for litigating alleged human rights violations.
Unlike other regional human rights courts, the African Court has
jurisdiction to consider alleged violations not only of its key regional
human rights instrument, the African Charter on Human and Peoples'
Rights, but also other international human rights instruments. In its
young history, the African Court has also demonstrated its ability to
tackle sensitive issues and deliver robust judgments on a range of topics
including freedom of expression, the right to fair trial and participation in
government. Moreover, the African Court has the power to issue
provisional orders and award reparations. However, accessing the
African Court remains difficult. In order for individuals and NGOs to
petition the African Court directly, the AU member state subject to the
application must have undertaken a triple layer of ratifications,
something that, at the time of writing, only eight out of 55 have done.
This paper examines how applicants can petition the African Court. It
reviews the three layers of ratification and suggests how potential
applicants may be able to use the African human rights system more
widely to circumnavigate jurisdictional hurdles. The paper concludes that
with proper access, the African Court has the potential to be a truly
continental court-what is required is further actions from the African
Court, member states, and civil society to put this into action.



   Oliver Windridge is a British lawyer specializing in international human rights and international
   criminal law. Oliver is founder of The ACtHPR Monitor, a website and blog dedicated to the
   African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights. He serves on the African Court on Human and
   Peoples' Rights List of Counsel (pro bono) and currently acts as counsel in cases pending before
   the African Court and African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights. Oliver is grateful to
   the WTLJ team for their assistance on this paper. The views expressed herein are those of the
   author and do not necessarily reflect the views of any organization affiliated with the author.
   Oliver can be contacted at oliver.windridge@gmail.com and via Twitter @oliverwindridge.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most