About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

61 Tex. L. Rev. 139 (1982-1983)
Sacred and the Profane: A First Amendment Definition of Religion

handle is hein.journals/tlr61 and id is 177 raw text is: Notes
The Sacred and the Profane:
A First Amendment Definition of
Religion
The determination that a belief or practice is religious carries a
variety of constitutional consequences.' The free exercise clause guar-
antees an individual's right to believe whatever he chooses and to carry
on religious activities, such as worship and proselytizing.2 Moreover,
the Supreme Court has interpreted the clause to require religious ex-
emptions from otherwise valid laws in some instances.3 The establish-
ment clause, on the other hand, prohibits government action that
1. See U.S. CONST. amend. I. (Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.   ... ).
2. The Supreme Court has frequently distinguished between an absolute right to believe
and a limited freedom to act according to the dictates of religion. See, e.g., Wisconsin v. Yoder,
406 U.S. 205, 219-20 (1972); Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296, 303-04 (1940). An individ-
ual's right to freedom of religious belief is rarely contested, but see Torcaso v. Watkins, 367 U.S.
488 (1961) (state constitution required belief in God in order to receive commission as notary
public), but the right to engage in traditional religious activities such as worship, see O'Hair v.
Andrus, 613 F.2d 931 (D.C. Cir. 1979), and proselytizing, see Heffron v. International Soc'y for
Krishna Consciousness, 452 U.S. 640 (1981); Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943); Jones
v. City of Opelika, 319 U.S. 103 (1943); Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940), is not
absolute.
3. In 1963 the Court held in Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963), that a Seventh-Day
Adventist could not be denied unemployment benefits after she was fired for refusing to work on
Saturday. The Court interpreted the free exercise clause to require that only a compelling state
interest could justify imposing a burden on the exercise of religion. Id at 403. Moreover, even a
compelling state interest had to be supported by a demonstration that government could achieve
its ends through no less restrictive means. Id at 407. See also Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205
(1972) (requiring religion-based exemption from state compulsory education statute for Old Order
Amish above the eighth grade).
The courts have decided a wealth of cases involving claims for religion-based exemptions.
Cases have involved Sabbath laws, e.g., Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U.S. 599 (1961); narcotics stat-
utes, eg., Leary v. United States, 383 F.2d 851 (5th Cir. 1967); Randall v. Wyrick, 441 F. Supp.
312 (W.D. Mo. 1977); People v. Woody, 61 Cal. 2d 716, 394 P.2d 813, 40 Cal. Rptr. 69 (1964);
social security legislation, e.g., Stevens v. Berger, 428 F. Supp. 896 (E.D.N.Y. 1977); monogamy
laws, e.g., Davis v. Beason, 133 U.S. 333 (1890); Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1878);
contempt rulings, e.g., In re Chase, 468 F.2d 128 (7th Cir. 1972); prison regulations, e.g., Brown v.
Wainwright, 419 F.2d 1376 (5th Cir. 1970); St. Claire v. Cuyler, 481 F. Supp. 732 (E.D. Pa. 1979);
Ron v. Lennane, 445 F. Supp. 98 (D. Conn. 1977); Maguire v. Wilkerson, 405 F. Supp. 637 (D.
Conn. 1975). See also Laycock, Towards a General Theory of the Religion Clauses: The Case of
Church Labor Relations and the Right to Church Autonomy, 81 COLUM. L. REv. 1373, 1389-90
(1981) (listing cases); Note, Religious Exemptions Under the Free Exercise Clause: A Model of
Competing Authorities, 90 YALE L.J. 350, 351-52 (1980) (listing cases).

139

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most