About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

68 Hastings L.J. 445 (2016-2017)
The Deregulation of Private Capital and the Decline of the Public Company

handle is hein.journals/hastlj68 and id is 478 raw text is: Articles The Deregulation of Private Capital and the Decline of the Public Company ELISABETH DE FONTENAY* From its inception, the federal securities law regime created and enforced a major divide between public and private capital raising. Firms that chose to go public took on substantial disclosure burdens, but in exchange were given the exclusive right to raise capital from the general public. Over time, however, the disclosure quid pro quo has been subverted: Public companies are still asked to disclose, yet capital is flooding into private companies with regulators' blessing. This Article provides a critique of the new public-private divide centered on its information effects. While regulators may have hoped for both the private and public equity markets to thrive, they may instead be hastening the latter's decline. Public companies benefit significantly less from mandatory disclosure than they did just three decades ago, because raising large amounts of capital no longer requires going and remaining public. Meanwhile, private companies are thriving in part by freeriding on the information contained in public company stock prices and disclosure. This pattern is unlikely to be sustainable. Public companies have little incentive to subsidize their private company competitors in the race for capital-and we are already witnessing a sharp decline in initial public offerings and stock exchange listings. With fewer and fewer public companies left to produce the information on which private companies depend, the outlook is uncertain for both sides of the securities-law divide. * Associate Professor, Duke University School of Law: defontenay@law.duke.edu. For comments and suggestions, thanks are due to Adam Badawi, Brad Bernthal, Joseph Blocher, Jamic Boyle, Guy-Uriel Charles, Jim Cox, John Coyle, Catherine de Fontenay, Deborah DeMott, Ofer Eldar, Mitu Gulati, Cathy Hwang, Kim Krawicc, Don Langevoort, Maggic Lemos, Marin Levy, Elizabeth Pollman, Urska Velikonja, Andrew Verstein, Jack Wroldson, Yesha Yadav, and workshop participants at Duke University School of Law and at the 2016 Junior Business Law Colloquium at the University of Colorado Law School. All errors are my own. [4451

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most