About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

22 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 273 (1987)
No State Shall Abridge: The Fourteenth Amendment and the Bill of Rights

handle is hein.journals/hcrcl22 and id is 279 raw text is: RECENT PUBLICATIONS

No State Shall Abridge: The Fourteenth Amendment and the
Bill of Rights. By Michael Kent Curtis. Durham, North Caro-
lina: Duke University Press, 1986. Pp. 275. $24.95 cloth.
In Dred Scott v. Sandford,' the United States Supreme
Court held that blacks were not citizens of the United States
and were not entitled to any of the rights, privileges, and im-
munities guaranteed to citizens under the Constitution. In the
aftermath of the Civil War, Republican members of Congress
embarked on an ambitious campaign to remedy this deplorable
state of affairs (pp. 36-37). Having seen the thirteenth amend-
ment abolishing slavery ratified by the states in 1865, the Re-
publican-controlled Congress sought to overrule Dred Scott by
granting the former slaves federal citizenship (and its attendant
privileges and immunities) through the Civil Rights Act of
1866. Still, many Republicans were not content to leave these
newly-created rights to the caprice of future congresses certain
to include considerable southern representation. As a condition
for readmission to the union, then, Republicans sought to re-
quire the southern states to ratify a constitutionalized version
of the Civil Rights Act: the fourteenth amendment (ch. 2).2
In the 120 years since ratification, the question of whether
the amendment's provisions incorporated the entire federal Bill
of Rights and applied it against the states has defied resolution.
Supreme Court decisions applying the Bill of Rights to the states
have typically embodied changing notions of federalism, but
have rarely relied on legislative history. Thus, in recent decades
the Court has selectively incorporated major portions of the Bill
I 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857).
2 Section 1 of the fourteenth amendment redefined United States citizenship to
extend to all persons born or naturalized in the United States. The amendment further
prohibits states from enacting laws which abridge the privileges and immunities of
United States citizens, deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due
process of law, or deny any citizen equal protection of the laws. U.S. Const., amend.
XIV, § 1.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most