About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

19 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 431 (2016-2017)
Time, Death, and Retribution

handle is hein.journals/upjcl19 and id is 439 raw text is: 







TIME, DEATH, AND RETRIBUTION


                              Chad Flanders*

                          TABLE OF CONTENTS

    INTRO  DU CTIO N ............................................................................. 431

    I. DISSECTING THE LACKEYMEMO ................................................ 438
         A. The Two Lackey Claims .................................................. 439
         B. Does it Matter if the Inmate Is Responsible for the Delay? ...... 444
         C. A  Third Lackey Claim? .................................................. 448

    II. Two VERSIONS OF RETRIBUTION ............................................ 454
         A. Community Outrage Retribution ...................................... 456
         B. Intrinsic Desert Retribution .............................................. 462
         C. Dying  in Prison .............................................................. 466

    III. IS RETRIBUTION A LEGITIMATE STATE PURPOSE? .................. 469
         A. Purposes of Punishment and the Supreme Court ................. 471
         B. Retribution as Establishment ............................................ 474
         C. Retribution as Animus .................................................... 479

    C O N CLU SIO N  ................................................................................. 482



                             INTRODUCTION

   Even before Justice John Paul Stevens wrote his so-called Lackey memo'
prisoners on death row were asserting that the lengthy delays-many times



     Associate Professor of Law, Saint Louis University School of Law. Thanks to Will Baude
     and Joe Welling for comments on early drafts. Joe was also extremely helpful in
     correcting and fleshing out many of the footnotes. I am also grateful for comments at the
     New Voices in Legal Theory workshop at Loyola University-New Orleans, especially
     those from Eric Miller, Ekow Yankah, and Sari Kisilevsky. Russell Christopher provided
     me with several pages of written comments. I do not hope to address them all, although
     (especially) in Section II.C. I try my best to. Stephen Galoob, in the course of a lengthy
     phone-call, pointed out many deficiencies in an earlier draft. All errors are my own.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most