About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

31 Int'l Crim. Just. Rev. 95 (2021)
Punishing Disease: HIV and the Criminalization of Sickness

handle is hein.journals/intcrm31 and id is 94 raw text is: Ch~d t~r updates Book Reviews 95 Hoppe, T. (2017). Punishing disease: HIV and the criminalization of sickness. Oakland, CA: University of California Press. 288 pp. $32.95. ISBN 9780520291607. Reviewed by: Jordan Nichols , George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA DOI: 10.1 177/1057567719883333 Hoppe delivers a compelling critique of criminal justice's incursion into public health. Examining efforts to criminalize disease through a case study of HIV, Hoppe sheds light on the mechanisms that facilitate the legitimization of criminalization as a disease control strategy and the consequences of that approach. Leaning on the early link made between AIDS and homosexuality, Hoppe outlines the potential for diseases to crystalize a specific set of social anxieties to propagate blame and highlights blame's powerful role in starting the process through which sickness becomes criminal. Hoppe's searing analysis forces readers to confront the assumptions embedded in perceptions of public health threats, acknowledge the role of prejudice and power, and uncover the harm perpetuated by punitive approaches to disease control. In Punishing Disease, Hoppe sets out to convince policy makers and the public that the effects of criminalization are predictable, reproducing stigma at the expense of- not in support of-public health. Through astonishingly detailed and varied analyses, Hoppe achieves this purpose, outlines remedial policy options, and proposes a conceptual map to assist stakeholders in recognizing this debilitating response to disease before its effects can be institutio- nalized in new battlegrounds, such as hepatitis and meningitis. Punishing Disease outlines the progression from coercion to punishment to criminalization in its two sections: (1) Punitive Disease Control and (2) The Criminalization of Sickness. While Hoppe is careful to contrast coercion and punishment, the book's formal organization understates the first phase in the progression. Hoppe's remedial policy options provide a glimpse of what alternatives to HIV punishment and criminalization may have looked like, but Hoppe does not explore alternative state hypotheses in his discussion of coercive (rather than criminal) disease control. Similarly, by ending with a chapter on victim impact, Punishing Disease deemphasizes a class of HIV disclosure law victims for which it exists to advocate. While the impact of criminalizing HIV is peppered throughout from differential advertising and access to treatment to the various sentences listed in relation to the cases' victim type, Punishing Disease does not present a unified and comprehensive summary of how these laws have increased and perpetuated harm to individuals living with HIV. Such a summary may have enhanced Hoppe's call to action to prevent the expansion of HIV disclosure laws to other diseases. The data behind Hoppe's narrative could not be more powerful. Punishing Disease relies on a comprehensive suite of data that align with each stage of its argument. Hoppe, for example, balances key outcome evaluations with studies of public opinion and content analyses of public policy and ad campaigns. Stressing blame's role in distinguishing punishment from coercion, Hoppe connects his argument associated with classical coercive disease control to the emergence of a policing role among public health officials through an analysis of the HIV Stops with Me ad campaign. This campaign's promotion of personal (rather than collective) responsibility for disease control intro- duced compelling information that would likely have been lost in a purely quantitative study. The expert balance Hoppe struck between quantitative and qualitative analyses was critical to supporting the full range of his comprehensive, systemic argument. Despite its testament to Hoppe's mastery of various schools of thought, Punishing Disease missed a critical opportunity to explicitly contribute to the wave of federal attention to evidence- based policymaking. Readers familiar with the decision-making perspective will see opportunities for its advocacy interwoven in Hoppe's contrast between scientific risk and value-motivated crim- inalization. Punishing Disease provides the information one would need to frame an evidence-based

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most