About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

36 GPSolo 37 (2019)
Civil Fines and the Cycle of Poverty

handle is hein.journals/gpsolo36 and id is 39 raw text is: 



--,-,_,_--z.C IVI.L..L FNESZI? AN THLEEm CYCL OF . POVERTY ----

                                        By   Ariadne S. Montare


In the 1980s  courts began  looking to
fines, fees, and penalties as a source of
revenue funding for the judicial system to
replace funds lost by cuts to state and
municipal budgets. This trend increased
following the 2008 recession. Now many
states are reevaluating their fees and
fines structures in response to increas-
ing pressure  from advocates   for the
poor and good government  groups.
   As a solo practicing in a rural area,
I spend a lot of time in town and city
courts in which I get to see firsthand the
impact that civil fines have on people on
the financial edge. On a typical evening,
many  of the defendants  are there for
unpaid parking tickets, violating civil or-
dinances, traffic violations, or driving on
a suspended  license. Many of the defen-
dants are appearing because they could
not afford to pay the associated fine, the
consequences  of which may be to drive
them even  deeper into financial trouble.
While larger cities may offer payment
plans for civil fines, such arrangements
are rare in small and rural localities.
   A look at driver's license suspensions
illustrates the scope of the problem.
As of 2017, 43  states and the District
of Columbia had the power  to suspend
a driver's license for unpaid civil fines,
which can create a vicious cycle: If the
offenders can't drive, they can't work; if
they can't work, they can't pay the fine; if
they can't pay the fine, they can't drive. If
they risk driving on a suspended license
and get  stopped, they will incur addi-
tional and harsher fines, making it all but
impossible for them to break the cycle.
Suspended   drivers who  are stopped
too often can find themselves incarcer-
ated, essentially jailed for their inability
to pay their traffic violations. Moreover,
most  of the states do not provide any
mechanism   for identifying drivers who
failed to pay fines because they could
not afford to.
   The number  of Americans who  have
their driver's licenses suspended for un-
paid court debt is staggering. In Virginia,


for example, 940,000  driver's licenses
have been  suspended  for unpaid court
debt in a statewide population of 8.47
million. In Texas, the number of these
suspensions  is 1.4 million; in Califor-
nia, it is a staggering 4 million. A study
in New Jersey found that 45 percent of
drivers whose licenses were suspended
lost their job as a result, and 45 percent
of those who lost their job were unable
to find new work while their license was
suspended,  and of those who were able
to find work, 85 percent reported a de-
crease in income. While some  jurisdic-
tions are addressing the problem through
diversionary relicensing programs, driv-
ers who cannot contribute to court debt
are usually ineligible. Some states in re-
sponse  are allowing defendants greater
access to judges who have the authority
to grant payment plans or are requiring
judges to consider ability to pay when
assessing  fines, but these piecemeal
approaches  fail to address those defen-
dants at the lowest end of the economic
spectrum.
   The National Center for State Courts
recently recommended   that states look
at eliminating driver's license suspen-
sions for nonpayment  of fines and fees
and  restricting suspensions to traffic
safety reasons. Notably, many  states
allow license suspensions for non-driving
violations, a practice that has  been
eliminated in Vermont and the State of
Washington.
   In addition to license suspensions,
defendants  who  cannot afford to pay
civil fines face accruing interest, penal-
ties, referral of the debt to collections


agencies, wage  garnishment, and pos-
sible incarceration for nonpayment, all
of which may make  it impossible for the
debt to ever be paid off. And debts owed
to governmental units are generally not
dischargeable in bankruptcy.
   The U.S. Department  of Justice's Of-
fice of Justice Programs (OJP) has noted
that these accumulated obligations can
result in hundreds, if not thousands, of
dollars of debt. Moreover, in certain ju-
risdictions, courts have routinely incar
cerated individuals for nonpayment  of
fines they simply cannot afford, which is
unconstitutional
   Awareness  of this issue is on the rise.
Initiatives noted by the OJP to address
the connection between court costs and
poverty include: a bench card for Ohio Su-
preme  Court judges instructing them on
constitutional and state law requirements
and alternatives to jail for those unable
to pay court fines and fees; Vermont's
prosecutor led driver's license restora-
tion day that gives individuals whose li-
censes were suspended  due to failure to
pay traffic fines an opportunity to pay a
minimal fine to satisfy delinquent tickets;
and a workgroup   in Michigan that has
produced  a report including legal guid-
ance, tools, and best practices to assist
judges and court staff with determining
an obligor's ability to pay, establishing
payment  plans, providing payment alter-
natives, enforcing court-ordered financial
obligations, and identifying uncollectible
debts. With increasing awareness, the
hope  is the trend to use fines and fees
for revenue generation at the expense of
the poor will be reversed. U


Ariadne S. Montare (ariadne@montarelaw.com) is a consumer law and
bankruptcy attorney in the Hudson River Valley of New York. She helps
clients facing all kinds of financial challenges, including credit card debt,
medical debt, student loan debt, and judgments. Previously, she was
a commercial litigator and creditors' counsel for a mix of small and
large firms in New York and Texas. Her practice now focuses on helping
consumers get back on their feet through education and negotiation, with
bankruptcy as a last resort. She blogs on issues affecting consumers
and small businesses at http://montarelaw.com/blog,


GPSOLO  I ambar.org/gpsolomag                                                                                               3


37

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most