About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

41 Yale J. on Reg. 591 (2024)
Rebuilding Banking Law: Banks as Public Utilities

handle is hein.journals/yjor41 and id is 591 raw text is: Rebuilding Banking Law: Banks as Public Utilities
Lev Menandt & Morgan Rickstt
Under the New Deal framework for money and payments-which
had its roots in the National Bank Act of 1864-banks in the United States
were governed in many respects as public utilities. Charters were available
only where they were consistent with public convenience and need, the
usual standard for utilities. Banks enjoyed an exclusive privilege to aug-
ment the money supply, maintaining deposit account balances that house-
holds and businesses could use as a means of payment and store of value.
Banks were largely limited to conducting activities consistent with their
monetary purpose. Geographic expansion was constrained to promote ad-
equate service to local communities. And a government agency, the Federal
Reserve, regulated the quantity of bank money in circulation and set the in-
terest that accrued to its holders. The result was an unprecedented period of
overall financial stability that lasted more or less until 2008.
Unfortunately, policymakers have steadily undermined and degraded
key elements of this system, and now its logic has been largely forgotten.
Deposit alternatives-financial products that as a formal, legal matter are
distinct from bank deposits but that function like them in practice-match
or exceed deposits in value, and the country's once-diffuse banking system
has given way to a top-heavy financial architecture in which a handful of
complex conglomerates engage in a broad range of monetary and non-
monetary financial activities with little meaningful government oversight.
Although policymakers dramatically expanded regulation after the 2008
financial crisis, we still face rolling panics, a central bank committed to
backstopping much of private finance, massive rent extraction by Wall
Street, and democratic decline.
This paper offers a blueprint for reform: what we call a New National
Banking system. Our goal is part restoration, part innovation. We aim to
both renew the framework that undergirded American prosperity in the
twentieth century and refine it by improving access to bank services and
t  Associate Professor of Law, Columbia Law School; Fellow, The Roosevelt Institute.
tt Herman O. Loewenstein Chair in Law, Vanderbilt Law School. The authors thank
Yochai Benkler, Christine Desan, Howell Jackson, Kate Judge, Joshua Macey, Saule Omarova,
Todd Phillips, Steven Schwarcz, Howard Shelanski, Nathan Tankus, Art Wilmarth, and Josh
Younger, as well as participants in seminars, workshops, and conferences at Harvard Law
School, Columbia Law School, Vanderbilt Law School, Brooklyn Law School, Michigan Law
School, Duke School of Law, Yale Law School, UC Berkeley School of Law, the U.S. Treasury
Department, and the European Commission Directorate-General for Financial Stability, Finan-
cial Services and Capital Markets Union.

591

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most