About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

41 U. Haw. L. Rev. 260 (2018-2019)
Adjudication vs. Negotiation in Protecting Environmental Commons

handle is hein.journals/uhawlr41 and id is 281 raw text is: 





   Adjudication vs. Negotiation in Protecting

                Environmental Commons



                            Daniel Bodansky*




I. IN T R O D U C T IO N   ............................................................................................ 260
II. WHAT IS AN ENVIRONMENTAL COMMONS? ...................................... 261
III. WHAT ROLE MIGHT COURTS PLAY IN PROTECTING
ENVIRONM   ENTAL   COM M ONS? .................................................................... 262
IV. NEGOTIATION VERSUS ADJUDICATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ................................................ 264
V . T H RE E  CA U TIO N S  ...................................................................................... 266
VI. HOW INTERNATIONAL COURTS ARE DIFFERENT ............................. 268
V II. CO N TEN TIO U S  CA SES  ............................................................................ 270
V III. A D V ISO RY   O PIN IO N S  ............................................................................. 273
IX. COMPARING NEGOTIATION WITH ADJUDICATION .......................... 275


                         I. INTRODUCTION

  In its list, Top 10 Developments in International Law in 2018, Oxford
University Press ranked [p]rotecting the environment through the courts
Number 1.1 The ranking is presumably based more on future potential than
past achievement since, to date, the actual impact of international
environmental adjudication has been rather modest. In support of the listing,
the OUP blog cites only the International Court of Justice's (I.C.J.) latest
opinion in Costa Rica v. Nicaragua, concerning damage to a wetland in Costa
Rica,2 the Inter-American Court of Human Rights' advisory opinion on the
right to a healthy environment,3 and domestic cases in Colombia4 and the


   * Regent's Professor, Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law, Arizona State University.
Thanks to Susan Biniaz and Jutta Brunnde for their very helpful comments. Any mistakes in
the article are, of course, my own.
   Merel Alstein, Top Ten Developments in International Law in 2018, OUPBLOG (Dec.
31, 2018), https://blog.oup.com/2018/12/top-ten-developments-intemational-law-2018.
   2 Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicar.),
Judgment, (Feb. 2, 2018), https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/150/150-20180202-JUD-
01-00-EN.pdf.
   3 The Environment and Human Rights (State obligations in relation to the environment
in the context of the protection and guarantee of the rights to life and to personal integrity -
interpretation and scope of Articles 4(1) and 5(1) of the American Convention on Human
Rights), Advisory Opinion OC-23/17, Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (ser. A) No. 23 (Nov. 15, 2017).
   4 Corte Suprema de Justicia [C.S.J.] [Supreme Court], Sala de Casaci6n Civil abril 5,

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most