About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

69 Tex. L. Rev. 209 (1990-1991)
Personalizing Personalty: Toward a Property Right in Human Bodies

handle is hein.journals/tlr69 and id is 231 raw text is: Personalizing Personalty: Toward a Property
Right in Human Bodies*
Ishould not like-under such circumstances, to be what I may call dispersed, a
part of me here and a part of me there, but should wish to collect myself like a
genteel person.
I. Introduction
While the above words could easily be those of a California man
seeking damages for the conversion of his spleen,' they are instead those
of Silas Wegg, a character in Dickens's last completed novel, Our Mutual
Friend. 2 Silas Wegg is a man with a wooden leg. His amputated leg is
owned by Mr. Venus, who buys bones and assembles human skeletons.
Silas Wegg's amputated leg, now part of the inventory of Venus, is only
one example of Dickens's transformation of his characters from personal-
ities to property.
Dickens's focus on the nexus between individuals and property ex-
tends throughout Our Mutual Friend. The novel opens with Gaffer
Hexam, a riverman, making his living by fishing the Thames for corpses,
which he strips of possessions and turns over to the police in exchange
for the missing person rewards. The corpses are Gaffer's stock-in-
trade, and the handbills kept on the wall of his home advertising the
rewards for the corpses he has found are his inventory.'3 A counter-
point to Gaffer's business of bodies is the story of Boffin the Golden
Dustman and his Dust Mounds,4 reminding the reader that a fortune,
one hundred thousand pounds to be precise, can be made from human
refuse and excrement.
Charles Dickens wrote long before the advent of modem biotechnol-
ogy, yet was wonderfully prescient about some of the dilemmas society
faces in delineating the extent of individuals' control over their persons.
In Our Mutual Friend, Dickens clearly foresaw the problems that recog-
nizing property interests in human beings creates. Silas Wegg, a victim
* The author wishes to thank her husband and family for their continuing support and
encouragement.
1. See Moore v. Regents of Univ. of Cal., 215 Cal. App. 3d 709, 249 Cal. Rptr. 494 (1988),
aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 51 Cal. 3d 120, 793 P.2d 479, 271 Cal. Rptr. 146 (1990).
2. C. DICKENS, OUR MUTUAL FRIEND 127 (Penguin 15th ed. 1984).
3. See id. at 64-65.
4. In Victorian London, domestic refuse was collected and dumped into private dust-yards.
The mounds were sifted, sorted into constituents, and sold. H. MAYHEW, LONDON LABOUR AND
THE LONDON POOR 158-81 (London 1861).

209

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most