About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

56 B.C. L. Rev. 493 (2015)
The Myth of the Double-Edged Sword: An Empirical Study of Neuroscience Evidence in Criminal Cases

handle is hein.journals/bclr56 and id is 493 raw text is: 






       THE MYTH OF THE DOUBLE-EDGED

       SWORD: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF

            NEUROSCIENCE EVIDENCE IN

                        CRIMINAL CASES



                             DEBORAH W. DENNO*


   Abstract: This Article presents the results of my unique study of 800 criminal
   cases addressing  neuroscience  evidence  over the past two  decades  (1992-
   2012). Many   legal scholars have theorized about the impact of neuroscience
   evidence on the criminal law, but this is the first empirical study of its kind to
   systematically investigate how  courts assess the mitigating and aggravating
   strength of such evidence. My  analysis reveals that neuroscience evidence is
   usually offered to mitigate punishments  in the way  that traditional criminal
   law has always allowed, especially in the penalty phase of death penalty trials.
   This finding  controverts the popular  image  of neuroscience  evidence  as a
   double-edged  sword-one that will either   get defendants  off the hook alto-


   <  2015, Deborah W. Denno. All rights reserved.
   *  Arthur A. McGivney Professor of Law, Fordham University School of Law. This Article is
the first in a series of publications based on my four-year project studying the intersection between
neuroscience and the criminal law. I am most grateful to the following individuals for their contri-
butions: George Conk, John Cording, Nestor Davidson, Michael Flomenhaft, Marianna Gebhardt,
Daniel Goddin, Clare Huntington, Sonia Katyal, Ellen Koenig, Bruce Kreter, Michael Martin,
Julie Salwen, David Tarras, Seth Tarras, Steve Thel, and Benjamin Zipursky. For insightful com-
ments on earlier versions of this Article, I thank the participants in presentations given at the An-
nual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Cornell Law School, Florida State Univer-
sity College of Law, Fordham University School of Law, the International Society for the Reform
of Criminal Law, Loyola University Chicago (School of Law and the Department of Criminal
Justice and Criminology), New York University School of Law (Hoffinger Criminal Justice Col-
loquium, Center for Research in Crime and Justice), Pace University School of Law, Southern
Methodist University Dedman School of Law, SUNY Buffalo Law School (Buffalo Criminal Law
Center), University of Richmond School of Law (Emroch Faculty Colloquy Series), Rutgers-
Camden  University School of Law (Rutgers Institute for Law and Philosophy), University of San
Diego School of Law (Institute for Law and Philosophy), Syracuse University College of Law, the
University of Texas School of Law, and Yale Law School. I give special thanks to a superb set of
research assistants who worked at varying times during the course of this project: Maurice Aaron
Neishlos, Adam Nicolais, John-Christopher Record, Faina Savich, Madhundra Sivakumar, Ariel
Sodomsky, Erica Valencia-Graham, and Katherine Yi. Fordham Law School's library staff, par-
ticularly Alissa Black-Dorward, provided continuously exceptional research support during the
entire project. With characteristic talent, Madhundra Sivakumar and Robert Yasharian created the
Article's charts. I am indebted to five sources for research funding without which this project
could not have existed: Fordham Law School, the Proteus Action League, Atlantic Philanthropies,
the Reynolds Family, and the Arthur and Charlotte Zitrin Foundation. Terence Lenamon gracious-
ly provided helpful information on the Grady Nelson case. Members of the Boston College Law
Review gave outstanding editorial assistance. Any mistakes or misjudgments are my own.


493

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most