About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

10 Health L. Rev. 6 (2001-2002)
Defining Medical Necessity: Challenges and Implications

handle is hein.journals/hthlr10 and id is 52 raw text is: 





















Introduction



The  concept of medically necessary services is deeply
imbedded in the Canadian medicare system, despite the fact
that it seems to defy clear analysis. Coming to grips with this
concept seems crucial to the sustainability of the system.
Some   commentators  are  concerned  that the  rapid
development of new, and increasingly expensive, medical
therapies willbankrupt any government that attempts to pay
for all services deemed to be medically necessary. Others


cite the fact that medications
prescribed by physicians are
not  insured as inescapable
evidence that the system needs
expansionbecause it already is
already failing to meet its
promise    of   providing
medically necessary therapy to
all Canadians.


In this brief paper I will take a critical look at the different
ways the concept of medical necessity is used, and the
work it does. I will focus, in turn, on each of the terms that
make up the concept. My aim is not to provide the complete
conceptual analysis which has eluded so many others.
Instead I hope to illuminate the challenges that must be met
if the concept is to continue to be useful in health care
planning.

I. The   Ambiguity of Medical

Necessity

The term medically necessary service suggests how we
decide that a treatment is necessary. Determinations of
necessity are made by medical practitioners. This is clearest
in the individual case where a medical doctor judges
whether any treatment is necessary for this patient. A system
set up in this manner puts great power into the hands of
physicians - power over the patient and over the health care


system.1 The patient's access to government-funded services
is controlled by her physician. The overall costs of the
system are greatly influenced by these medical judgments.

To  say  that a service is medically necessary is also
symbolically important: it is to say that the service is a
necessity of a particularly important sort. An individual's
medical necessity has a particularly strong claim on the
public imagination. In the public mind medical necessity is
in a class by itself, separate from any other necessity one
might identify. It is a necessity which should not go unmet,
                           even in an era of reduced
                           government involvement is
edically  necessary        the  provision of   social
Ortant:  it is to say      services. If the government
                           has an obligation to provide
  necessity     of  a      for any of the needs of its
1-                         citizens, it surely has an
                           obligation to meet medical
                           needs. Any  shift to a less
 evocative word risks losing this support for public payment.


 II.  The   Beguiling Simplicity of

 Medical Necessity


 Much  of the discussion of medical necessity focuses on
 separating what is necessary from what is optional or
 elective. The analysis tries to distinguish people's genuine
 needs from their mere desires. Given that the patient has
 been accurately diagnosed as suffering from a condition (be
 it a crooked nose, infertility or erectile dysfunction), the
 question becomes: is it necessary for the condition to be
 treated? The very point of drawing this distinction is to
 decide whether treatment should be paid for out of the
 public purse. If only we can find the boundary between the
 necessary and the optional, we will have found a natural
 place to set the limit on what treatments are insured services.
 While most people are willing to help others meet their
 genuine medical needs through a publicly funded system,


6                                                                           Health  Law  Review


Defining Medical Necessity:



Challenges and Implications


                            Glenn Griener


To  say that a service  is m
is also  symbolically   imp
that   the   service   is  a
particularly  important  so,


6


Health Law  Review

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most