About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

45 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 313 (2017-2018)
Severe Brain Injury, Disability, and the Law: Achieving Justice for a Marginalized Population

handle is hein.journals/flsulr45 and id is 336 raw text is: 







   SEVERE BRAIN INJURY, DISABILITY, AND THE LAW:
                    ACHIEVING JUSTICE FOR A
                    MARGINALIZED POPULATION


  MEGAN S. WRIGHT, NINA VARSAVA, JOEL RAMIREZ, KYLE EDWARDS,
       NATHAN GUEVREMONT, TAMAR EZER, AND JOSEPH J. FINs*

                                   ABSTRACT
    Thousands of persons with severe brain injury who are minimally conscious or locked
in are wrongly treated as if they are unconscious. Such individuals are unable to advocate
for themselves and are typically segregated from society in hospitals or nursing homes. As a
result, they constitute a class of persons who often lack access to adequate medical care,
rehabilitation, and assistive devices that could aid them in communication and recovery.
While this problem is often approached from a medical or scientific point of view, here we
frame it as a legal issue amenable to legal remedies. This Article comprehensively explores
and analyzes sources of federal, state, and international human rights law that can be lev-
eraged-both in traditional and novel ways-to improve the lives and protect the rights of
persons with severe brain injury. We argue that state laws may be the most promising basis
for legal action to ameliorate the clinical marginalization and societal neglect faced by per-
sons with severe brain injury, and to promote their recovery and reintegration into their
communities.


     I. INTRODUCTION..............................       .............................. 314
     II. EPIDEMIOLOGY OF SEVERE BRAIN INJURY AND DIAGNOSTIC FRAMEWORK OF
        DISORDERS OF CONSCIOUSNESS      ............................................  317
   III. JUSTICE FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE BRAIN INJURY UNDER FEDERAL LAW.....       322
         A. United States Constitution               ....................................... 322
           1. Due Process                       ....................... ......................... 323
           2. Equal Protection                    ............................................. 325
         B. Disability Discrimination Statutes and Case Law  ............... ...... 328
           1. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act ............ .................  328
           2. Americans with Disabilities Act and Olmstead Enforcement..............  329
         C. Affordable Care Act .    ............................................. 334
           1. Nondiscrimination.     .............................. .............  334
           2. Essential Health Benefits    ...................................... 335
           3. Changes to Medicaid                   ......................................... 336
         D. Statutes and Regulations for Subpopulations of Persons with Severe
           Brain Injury                        ................................................... 339



     *  Megan S. Wright, J.D., Ph.D. is a Postdoctoral Associate of Medical Ethics at Weill
Cornell Medical College and a Research Fellow at the Solomon Center for Health Law and
Policy at Yale Law School. Nina Varsava is a J.D. candidate at Yale Law School and a
Ph.D. candidate at Stanford University. Joel Ramirez, J.D., is an Associate with Morrison
Foerster, San Francisco, CA. Kyle Edwards, D.Phil and Nathan Guevremont are J.D. can-
didates at Yale Law School. Tamar Ezer, J.D., L.L.M. is a Lecturer in Law, Associate Re-
search Scholar in Law, Schell Visiting Human Rights Scholar, and the former Executive
Director of the Solomon Center for Health Law and Policy at Yale Law School. Joseph Fins,
M.D., M.A.C.P. is the E. William Davis, Jr., M.D. Professor of Medical Ethics at Weill Cor-
nell Medical College, co-director of the Consortium for the Advanced Study of Brain Injury
at Weill Cornell Medical College and Rockefeller University, and the Solomon Center Dis-
tinguished Scholar in Medicine, Bioethics, and the Law at Yale Law School. The authors
wish to acknowledge the support of the Jerold B. Katz Foundation, the Solomon Center for
Health Law and Policy at Yale Law School, and Weill Cornell Medical College, and thank
Professor Abbe Gluck for her support and for helping to make this collaboration possible.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most