About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

131 Yale L. J. 573 (2021-2022)
A Relational Theory of Data Governance

handle is hein.journals/ylr131 and id is 595 raw text is: SALOME VILJOEN A Relational Theory of Data Governance ABSTRACT. Data-governance law-the legal regime that regulates how data about people is collected, processed, and used-is the subject of lively theorizing and several proposed legislative reforms. Different theories advance different legal interests in information. Some seek to reassert individual control for data subjects over the terms of their datafication, while others aim to max- imize data-subject financial gain. But these proposals share a common conceptual flaw. Put simply, they miss the point of data production in a digital economy: to put people into population-based relations with one another. This relational aspect of data production drives much of the social value and harm of data collection and use in a digital economy. This Feature advances a theoretical account of data as social relations, constituted by both legal and technical systems. It shows how data relations result in supraindividual legal interests. Properly representing and adjudicating among those interests necessitates far more public and col- lective (i.e., democratic) forms of governing data production. Individualist data-subject rights cannot represent, let alone address, these population-level effects. This account offers two insights for data-governance law. First, it better reflects how and why data collection and use produce economic value as well as social harm in the digital economy. This brings the law governing data flows into line with the economic realities of how data production operates as a key input to the information economy. Second, this account offers an alternative nor- mative argument for what makes datafication-the transformation of information about people into a commodity-wrongful. What makes datafication wrong is not (only) that it erodes the ca- pacity for subject self-formation, but instead that it materializes unjust social relations: data rela- tions that enact or amplify social inequality. This account indexes many of the most pressing forms of social informational harm that animate criticism of data extraction but fall outside typical ac- counts of informational harm. This account also offers a positive theory for socially beneficial data production. Addressing the inegalitarian harms of datafication- and developing socially beneficial alternatives -will require democratizing data social relations: moving from individual data-subject rights to more democratic institutions of data governance. 573

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most