About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

56 Stan. L. Rev. 161 (2003-2004)
Redefining Race: Can Genetic Testing Provide Biological Proof of Indian Ethnicity

handle is hein.journals/stflr56 and id is 175 raw text is: NOTE
Redefining Race: Can Genetic Testing
Provide Biological Proof of Indian Ethnicity?
Eric Beckenhauer*
INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 162
I. DEFINING INDIAN IN THE UNITED STATES: ANCESTRY AND BLOOD .............. 164
A. Federal Definitions ..................................................................................... 164
B. Tribal Definitions ........................................................................................ 166
1. Blood quantum requirements.................................................................. 167
2. D escendancy   requirements   .................................................................... 172
C. Toward a Functional Definition of Indian Ethnicity .............................. 174
II. CAN GENETIC TESTING IMPROVE ETHNIC IDENTIFICATION?............................ 175
A. Prevalence of Variants Within Human Subpopulations.............................. 176
B. Private Polymorphisms ............................................................................... 177
1. The  Y  chrom osom e  .................................................................................  178
2. Mitochondrial DNA ............................................................................... 179
C. Ethnic-Affiliation Estimation with Population-Specific DNA Markers....... 180
D . Lim itations  of  DNA  Analysis....................................................................... 181
1. Is presence of a private polymorphism proof of Indian ancestry?.......... 181
2. Is absence of a private polymorphism disproof of Indian ancestry?....... 182
3. Can presence of a polymorphism indicate degree of Indian ancestry?.. 182
E. Assessing the Utility of DNA Analysis......................................................... 184
III. ATTEMPTS TO GENETICALLY DEFINE INDIANS-AND NATIVE AMERICAN
REACTION ............................................................................................................. 184
A. Vermont House Bill 809.............................................................................. 184
B. Native American Objections to Genetic Definitions of Ethnicity ................ 186
1. Indian is a culture-not a genotype.................................................... 186
2. Genetic definitions of Indian will usurp tribal sovereignty ............... 187
3. Condoning genetic testing in this context legitimizes scientific inquiry, and
its  consequences, in  other contexts  ............................................................ 188
CONCLUSION......................................................................................................... 190

161

J.D. Candidate, Stanford Law School, 2004. B.S., with highest honors, University of
California, Davis, 1998. Notes Editor, Stanford Law Review, Volume 56.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most