About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

27 Stan L. Rev. 73 (1974-1975)
An Indigent's Right to the Attorney of His Choice

handle is hein.journals/stflr27 and id is 91 raw text is: An Indigent's Right to the
Attorney of His Choice
Peter W. Tague*
In Drumgo v. Superior Court' the California Supreme Court reversed
a court of appeals decision that might have become one of the most impor-
tant cases involving an indigent criminal defendant's right to counsel since
Gideon v. Wainwright.a The court of appeals had granted a writ of man-
date ordering a trial judge to replace court-chosen counsel with an attorney
requested by an indigent defendant. The decision was apparently the first
of its kind in the country and, although carefully limited to its facts, had
potentially far-reaching significance. In reversing, the Supreme Court not
only approved the action of the trial court judge in Drumgo, but also indi-
rectly sanctioned similar court action in three other widely publicized, re-
cent homicide trials in California.'
I. BACKcGROUND
A. The Factual Setting
Drumgo arose from an alleged escape attempt by George Jackson, an
inmate in San Quentin prison, that resulted in the deaths of Jackson, two
*A.B. 1965, Harvard College; J.D. 1969, University of Michigan Law School; member of the
California, New York and Washington, D.C. bars.
1. 8 Cal. 3d 930, 506 P.2d o0E7L, i0E6L Cal. Rptr. 631, cert. denied, 414 U.S. 979 (1973), vacating
103 Cal. Rptr. oo (xst Dist. 1972).
2. 372 U.S. 335 (1963) (the landmark case holding that the due process clause of the fourteenth
amendment demanded the appointment of attorneys for indigents in state felony proceedings).
3. The three homicide cases were People v. Allen, Cr. No. 2725 (Super Ct., Monterey Cty.,
May 27, 3971) (hereinafter the Soledad 7); People v. Gibson, Cr. No. 4X50 (Super. Ct., Main
Cty., April 18, 1973); and People v. Rios, Cr. No. 75r29 (Super. Ct., San Fran. Cty., Nov. 7, 1970)
(hereinafter Los Siete). Because all were fascinating cases, each deserves some discussion.
The Soledad 7 were seven black prison inmates charged with murdering a white guard in
Soledad prison in California on July 13, 1970. They objected to the attorneys chosen by the trial
court and asked that several particular attorneys be appointed in their stead. (The court was prepared
to appoint one of the attorneys the defendants requested-he had initially represented all seven with-
out appointment before conflicts of interest surfaced that required representation by separate attorneys.)
The court refused the requests, although it would have permitted the attorneys to enter the case if
they would have done so without appointment and therefore without fee. Reporter's Transcript, Nov.
8, 1970, at 37-63. Ultimately the prosecution dropped the charges against three defendants and the
trial court later dismissed the charges against the remaining three defendants.
In People v. Gibson, two defendants, inmates at San Quentin prison, were convicted of murder-
ing a guard during an abortive attempt to kill a hospitalized inmate who had apparendy been willing
to testify for the prosecution in the Soledad 7 trial. The trial court initially denied the defendants'
request for appointment of particular attorneys, but then reversed itself and honored their request
after the court of appeals decided Drumgo. Conversation with Richard Hodge, Mar. 20, 1972 (at-
torney requested by one of the indigents).
In Los Siete, sLx Spanish-speaking youths were acquitted of charges of killing a San Francisco
policeman following a 37-week trial. S.F. Chronicle, Nov. 8, 1970, at i, col. 7. Before the trial began,

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most