About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

93 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 318 (2018)
First Amendment Coverage

handle is hein.journals/nylr93 and id is 326 raw text is: 





           FIRST AMENDMENT COVERAGE


                               AMANDA SHANOR*

     Neither courts nor scholars have articulated a coherent theory of the scope of the
     First Amendment's freedom of speech. Most First Amendment jurisprudence and
     scholarship has focused on the justification for the freedom of speech or questions
     of constitutional protection-essentially, how much scrutiny should apply in
     various contexts. Largely ignored is the often-dispositive threshold question of
     whether activities are covered by the First Amendment at all. Many activities that
     are colloquially considered speech are not traditionally subject to constitutional
     review. For instance, the regulation of contracts, commercial fraud, perjury, con-
     spiracy, workplace harassment, the compelled speech of tax returns, and large
     swaths of regulation by the administrative state have all historically been treated as
     beyond the ambit of the First Amendment.
     Today, however, the boundaries of the First Amendment are in a period of trans-
     formation. Plaintiffs across the country contend that the regulation of areas of
     social and economic life that never before were thought relevant to the Constitution
     is in violation of it. Courts are increasingly confronted with cases that raise the
     question: Does the First Amendment apply? This makes the need for a theory of
     the scope of the right of free speech-of the First Amendment's boundaries-ever
     more pressing.
     This Article develops, first, a descriptive and sociologically-based theory of First
     Amendment coverage. By analyzing differences between free speech sub-doctrines,
     I argue that the animatinlg difference between what falls within the First Amend-
     ment's reach and what is excluded from it does not rest on the distinction between
     speech and conduct, as is often thought. Instead, coverage depends on whether or
     not social norms about a given practice are (or courts believe should be) suffi-
     ciently strong to make the anticipated consequences of the speech-how it works
     and what it does-clear. Coverage depends, in short, on whether or not the audi-
     ence of the activity is pluralistic.
     Second, this Article develops a prescriptive theory of how courts should analyze
     questions of the boundaries of free speech. I argue that, at the borders of the First
     Amendment, courts must analyze the social context of the activity in question as
     well as the normative and institutional implications of charting First Amendment
     coverage.
     I conclude by exploring the issues at stake in current and emerging First Amend-
     ment coverage questions. I argue that the scope of the First Amendment reflects and
     defines the areas of social life in which we need or want cohesive, non-pluralistic,
     social norms and relationships. In short, the boundaries of the First Amendment
     track not only the space of pluralistic contestation, but also the expectation of and
     desire for social cohesion.

     * Copyright © 2018 by Amanda Shanor, Ph.D. Candidate in Law, Yale University,
Adjunct Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center; J.D., Yale Law School;
B.A., Yale College. My many thanks to Floyd Abrams, Jack Balkin, Emily Chapuis, David
Cole, William Eskridge, Jr., Leslie Kendrick, Robert Post, David Pozen, Rebecca Tushnet,
and the participants of the Freedom of Expression Scholars Conference at Yale Law
School for their input and insights. All errors are my own.

                                         318


Imaged with Permission of N.Y.U. Law Review

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most