About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

35 B.C. J. L. & Soc. Just. 229 (2015)
Cultural Bias in Judicial Decision Making

handle is hein.journals/bctw35 and id is 238 raw text is: 





            CULTURAL BIAS IN JUDICIAL
                     DECISION MAKING


                               MASUA SAGIV*

   Abstract: This Essay describes the phenomenon of cultural bias injudicial deci-
   sion making, and examines the use of testimonies and opinions of cultural ex-
   perts as a way to diminish this bias. The Essay compares the legal regimes of the
   United States and Israel. Whereas in the United States, the general practice of us-
   ing cultural experts in courts is well developed and regulated, the Israeli legal
   procedure has no formal method for admitting cultural expert testimony, and ex-
   amples of opinions or testimonies of cultural experts in the Israeli legal system
   are sporadic. The Essay further argues that social science evidence is an essential
   but insufficient means of reducing the cultural bias ofjudges. Judges' reliance on
   cultural experts can also be fueled by a preexisting cultural agenda disguised as
   an informed judgment. The Essay concludes with a suggestion of measures that
   can be implemented alongside the use of cultural experts in order to increase
   judges' awareness of the cultural bias and mitigate its consequences.

                               INTRODUCTION

     The tension between the legal procedure's goals of neutrality, equality,
and impartiality, and the fact thatjudges are human beings that are influenced
by their life experiences, has been vastly debated in legal and psychological
literature. This Essay focuses on one among many existing biases in judicial
decision making: cultural bias.
     When judges adjudicate cases, they use not only legal knowledge, but
also knowledge about the world. The source of the judges' knowledge about
the world is their common sense, which is the intangible cultural system that
contains people's informal knowledge about the world from their social
group's point of view. Insomuch as the judges' interpretation about the world is



    © 2015, Masua Sagiv. All rights reserved.
    * Ph.D. Candidate, Zvi Meitar Center for Advanced Legal Studies, Buchmann Faculty of Law,
Tel Aviv University. LL.B. (Law & Political Science), Bar-Ilan University Faculty of Law. LL.M.,
Columbia University School of Law. E-mail: masuasagivgpost.tau.ac.il. I was fortunate to have the
opportunity to present this Essay at two workshops foryoung scholars, the Yale Law School 3rd Doc-
toral Scholarship Conference and the Law in a Changing Transnational World workshop that took
place at Tel Aviv University Law Faculty. I wishto thank the participants of bothworkshops for their
excellent comments and insights. I would like to extend particular gratitude to Menachem Mautner,
James T. Richardson, Yofi Tirosh Roman Zinigrad, Mohsin Alam Bhat and Benjamin Perryman for
their helpful comments.
                                    229

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most