About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

45 ACTEC L.J. 37 (2019-2020)
The Need for a New Type of Purpose Trust, the Stewardship Trust

handle is hein.journals/acteclj45 and id is 41 raw text is: 





      The   Need   for  a  New   Type of Purpose Trust,
                    the  Stewardship Trust

                           Susan N. Gary*

                  I.  HISTORY  OF PURPOSE   TRUSTS
    The  Uniform  Trust Code (UTC)  authorizes trusts for noncharitable
purposes that lack an identifiable beneficiary. UTC Section 408 autho-
rizes a trust for the care of an animal, and UTC Section 409 authorizes a
trust for a noncharitable purpose without an ascertainable beneficiary.
This latter type of trust is often called a purpose trust and that identifier
will be used in this essay. Sections 408 and 409 built on the use of honor-
ary trusts for noncharitable purposes, but create an actual trust struc-
ture, with certain constraints. A trust that meets the requirements of
either section will be valid and enforceable.
    A  few creative lawyers are now  using purpose trusts for business
planning,' and Section 409 certainly permits doing so, but the structure
and constraints of Section 409 are not well suited for trusts holding the
assets of a business. Given the history of Sections 408 and 409, it seems
likely that business trusts were not on the minds of the UTC Drafting
Committee.  The  constraints built into these sections reflect concerns
about the types of purpose trusts that had surfaced in cases and there-
fore were envisioned by the drafters. A trust used for business purposes
has different needs, and the concerns related to such a trust are differ-
ent. The addition of a new section to the UTC, authorizing a steward-
ship trust, will address the needs and concerns of a trust holding the
assets of business.
    Under  the common   law a trust must have a beneficiary, but an ex-
ception has long existed for charitable trusts. Trusts that had neither an
identifiable beneficiary nor a charitable purpose were invalid and unen-
forceable.2 In some cases, courts refused to permit an intended trustee

    * Orlando J. and Marian H. Hollis Professor of Law, University of Oregon. A more
thorough examination of steward-ownership, the history of purpose trusts, and the new
Oregon stewardship trust statute can be found in The Oregon Stewardship Trust: A New
Type of Purpose Trust that Enables Steward-Ownership of a Business, posted on SSRN at
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstractjid=3426845.
    1 See Alexander A. Bove, Jr., The Purpose of Purpose Trusts, 18 PROB. & PROP.,
May/June 2004, at 34, 37.
    2 RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TRUSTS § 123 (AM. LAW INST. 1959); RESTATEMENT
(THIu) OF TRUST s§ 47 cmt. d (AM. LAW INST. 2003).


37

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most