About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

37 Med. & L. 87 (2018)
Comparative Medical Liability Law: Some Practical Notes on Methodology

handle is hein.journals/mlv37 and id is 93 raw text is: 

Med   Law (2018)  37:1:87-100                                 Medicine
                                                                and  Law
                                                            World Association
                                                            for Medical  Law


COMPARATIVE MEDICAL LIABILITY LAW: SOME PRACTICAL
NOTES ON METHODOLOGY



Rui  Casciio'

           Sciences that worry too much about their own methodology are sick sciences
                 Gustav Radbruch, Einfuhrung in die Rechtswissenschaft, 1910

        Abstract:  This  article provides a set of  practical guidelines for
        research in the field of medical liability employing the comparative
        method,  based on  a flexible functional approach. Topics worthy of
        consideration in a comparative study in the specific field of medical
        liability are highlighted and analysed. It also outlines the challenges of
        such research in the Asia-Pacific region.

        Keywords:   Comparative  Law; Medical  Liability; Functional Method;
        Research  Methodology;  Asia-Pacific


1. Introduction

Comparative   law is not yet a mature legal discipline. It is relatively recent
and has its contemporary  roots in a Congress held under the umbrella of the
1900  Paris World Exhibition. It is a field that receives only modest attention
in the undergraduate legal education curricula of most jurisdictions3. It is also
seen with distrust, as a science living in a ghetto by many streams of legal
thought  in many  jurisdictions, in particular by post-modernist flavours of
jurisprudence'.




1   Rui Cascao, LL.B. (Coimbra), Ph.D. (Tilburg). Senior Legal Advisor, Legal Affairs
    Bureau, Govermnent of the Macau Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic
    of China; Principal Researcher (pro-bono), Juridical Institute/Centre for Biomedical Law,
    University of Coimbra, Portugal. The opinion and views set out in this article are those
    of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the aforementioned
    affiliations. Email: rui.cascao~gmail.com
2   Zweigert/Ktz (1998).
3   Bitas (2012).
4   Markesinis (2009), Peters/Schwenke (2000).
                                     87

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most