About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

11 Va. L. & Bus. Rev. 1 (2016-2017)

handle is hein.journals/valbr11 and id is 1 raw text is: 











VIRGINIA LAW & BUSINESS REVIEW
VOLUME 11                      FALL   2016                        NUMBER 1



A  STATUTORY AND PRECEDENTIAL APPROACH TO
  CORPORATE SCIENTER IN SECTION 10(b) OF THE
                 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT

                             Travis S. Andrewst

                                 ABSTRACT

        Evey  pear, hundreds of private lawsuits alleging violations of Section
        10(b)'s antifraud provision of the Securities Exchange Act are filed in
        federal courts. These lawsuits have a substantial impact on the national
        economy, with milkons of dollars at stake in most cases. While the
        Supreme  Court has clarfied many questions of ambzguity within the
        Pvate   Securties ILtigation Reform Act of 1995 ('PSLRA'), the
        Court has not opined on the scienter requirement for claims involving a
        corporate defendant. A circuit spt has thus developed surrounding
        corporate sdenter. When permitted, this doctrine allows a plaintiff to
        meet the PSLRA's  pleading requirement ly alleging one person had the
        requisite state of mind when another person committed the fraudulent
        act. The corporate sienter doctrine therefore allows the plaintiff to more
        easily bring a lawsuit against a corporate defendant, leading to the
        potential forforum shopping and inequitable results among defendants.
        I examine the current circuit spt, which was fractured even more after
        the Sixth Circuit's recent creation of a new pleading standard. After
        examining the current approaches to corporate sienter, I study the text
        and  structure of the PSLRA to argue for a new approach to corporate
        sdenter. My suggested approach would require plaintiffs to demonstrate
        (1) that an executive officer made or approved a fraudulent statement


t   J.D., 2016, University of Virginia. I would like to thank Professor Julia Mahoney for her
    feedback on earlier drafts of this Note, as well as the editorial board of the VitiniaLaw &
    Business Reiew for their meticulous editing. All remaining errors are my own.

Copyright C 2016 Virginia Law & Business Review Association


1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most