About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

65 Va. J. Int'l L. 1 (2024-2025)

handle is hein.journals/vajint65 and id is 1 raw text is: 








                                    ARTICLE


       Challenging and Enforcing International

       Arbitral Awards in U.S. Federal Courts:

                         An Empirical Study


                         CHRISTOPHER R. DRAHOZAL
                         DONALD EARL CHILDRESS III
                                JACKJ.   COE,   JR.
                           CATHERINE A. ROGERS*

     One of thep'imary reasons wh' transnationa/lactorspreer international arbitration
over international/ itigation is that/they anticipate thatthose internationaarbitra/l awards
not vo/untariy comp/ied with are highly enorceab/e in nationa/ courts. This assumption
is e'pecia/|y orce'u/lwith re'pect to U.S. ederal/courts. Historica/!y, man y commentators
have estimatedthat national/courtsgive effectto about90% o all/awards.    'lhen scho/ars
set out to test empirically this estimated 90%  rate, however, the'y reportedfidig lower
rates at which nationa /courtsgive effect to awards. These empiric tuIdies a //suffer  >m
methodo/ogica/shortcomings that have distorted their resu/ts. Thep rimry methodo/ogica!
de iciency o these studies was their re/iance on commercia/l  databases, su<h as lY es/aw or
the K   luwer Arbitration database. These databases existfor lega/ research, not empirical
research. As a resu/t, the'y do not contain orpu/port to contain either a  comprehensive or
a representative set of cases.
     This Article, by contrast, reports on U.S. federal court treatment of international
arbitral awards based on an original dataset compiled from U.S. federal court dockets,
which list all cases filed in federal courts. Based on this dataset, wefind that other empirical
studies understate, sometimes dramatically, the rates at which U.S. federal courts give
effect to awards.
     Our  dataset consists of 960 petitions to confirm, enforce, or vacate international
arbitra/ awards that were filed in cases docketed in U.S. federal courts between 2011 and


     * Christopher R. Drahozal: John M. Rounds Professor of Law, University of Kansas School of
Law. Donald Earl Childress III: Professor of Law, Pepperdine University Caruso School of Law. Jack
J. Coe, Jr.: Professor of Law, Pepperdine University Caruso School of Law. Catherine A. Rogers:
Professor of Law, Bocconi University; Affiliated Scholar at the Center for Negotiation and Dispute
Resolution (CNDR) and Research Professor at University of California, College of the Law, San
Francisco.
     The authors are especially grateful for the very helpful research assistance of Ryan Brown, Izabela
Morrigi Costa, Sarmad Majeed, Kendall Strabala, Brian Vanorsby, Derek Ulrich, and Anlin Ye. Thanks
to JoelJohnson, Benno Kimmelman, Bo Rutledge, Steve Ware, and Chris Whytock, and to participants
at the AALS ADR Works-in-Progress Conference at Quinnipiac University School of Law, participants
at the Midwestern Law & Economics Association Annual Meeting at Maurer School of Law, Indiana
University Bloomington, and attendees at the Fordham Conference on International Arbitration and
Mediation for their very helpful comments.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most