About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

59 U.S.F. L. Rev. 1 (2024-2025)

handle is hein.journals/usflr59 and id is 1 raw text is: 











The Problematic Nature of Punishment

for Secret Taping


                                                    By CAROL  M.  BAST*


Introduction

EAVESDROPPING   has been  practiced and  condemned   for centuries. The
disreputable  part of eavesdropping   is that, although the participants
in the conversation  are discussing something   of a private nature, the
eavesdropper   takes satisfaction in secretly obtaining information with-
out alerting the people involved in the conversation.
     Communication privacy is   vital to one's well-being, and one gener-
ally assumes that a disclosure made  to a confidante will not be shared
with others  and will certainly not be taped.  However,  a good  reason
for taping  may  be to gather  evidence  of domestic  violence or other
crimes. In addition, the other  discussant may not  be as trustworthy as
one  assumed.  The  person  exposing   extremely  personal information
takes the risk that the other person will repeat or tape the conversation.
The  difference between   retelling a private conversation and taping it
is that taping captures  the exact wording,   context, and  tone  of the
conversation.
     Eavesdrop  taping, secret taping  by a non-party  to a private con-
versation, is  still widely considered  a  privacy violation,  although
rapidly advancing   technology  makes  it easy and tempting   to do so.1

    *  Carol M. Bast is professor in the Department of Legal Studies at the University of
Central Florida, where she has taught for more than thirty years. She teaches Legal Research
and Legal Writing and authored an undergraduate textbook on those topics. She teaches
the survey course, Law and the Legal System, and co-authored an undergraduate textbook
used in the course. Her areas of research and writing include eavesdropping and wiretap-
ping, plagiarism, legal ethics, artificial intelligence, legal research, legal writing, and inter-
national trade agreements. She served as editor-in-chief of the Journal of Legal Studies in
Business, November 2008 to November 2010; she served as editor-in-chief of the Journal of
Legal Studies Education, August 2006 to August 2008. Prior to becoming a professor, Bast
clerked for a federal district judge and practiced corporate, securities, and real estate law.
She received her LL.M. in International Economic Law and Policy from the University of
Barcelona in 2016, her J.D. magna cum laude from New York Law School in 1982, and her
B.A. from Kalamazoo College in 1974.
    1. Julia Keller, Eavesdropping: The Forgotten Public Nuisance in the Age of Alexa, 77 VAND.
L. REV. 169, 218-19 (2024).


1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most