About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

100 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1 (2024-2025)

handle is hein.journals/tndl100 and id is 1 raw text is: ARTICLES THE TROUBLE WITH CLASSIFICATIONS Aziz Z. Huq * The Supreme Court relies increasingly on anticlassification rules to implement the Constitution's various commands of evenhanded state treatment. These rules direct attention to whether an instance of aforbidden classification is present on theface of a challenged law. They contain two necessary steps. First, a court defines a general category of impermissible terms. Second, a court ascertains whether an instance of the category is found in enacted text-so triggering the familiar strict scrutiny analysis. So defined, anticlassification rules now dominate equal protection, free speech, dormant Commerce Clause, and evenfree exercisejurisprudence. TheRoberts Court celebrates these doctrinal tests as commonsense, citing their administrability and me- chanical quality as safeguards against problematicjudicial discretion. This Article challenges this account of anticlassification rules as simple and transparent. It draws extensively on conceptual toolsfrom the philosophy of language to elucidate the inherent complications and internal tensions ofthe doctrine. Defining and drawing bounds around categories such as race and content discrimination, for example, cannot be done without a theory of what philosophers of language call natural kinds and social kinds. Yet when courts identify instances of impermissible categories in legal text, they tend to fluctuate erratically between semantic and commu- nicative theories of meaning. A careful examination of these, and other, hidden prem- ises ofanticlassification clarifies apparent doctrinal inconsistencies. Absent a system- atic theorizing of such difficulties, anticlassification rules cannot be coherently or consistently applied. Reckoning with these difficulties suggests that the Court's main normative justifications for anticlassification have a narrower reach than commonly appreciated. @ 2024 Aziz Z. Huq. Individuals and nonprofit institutions may reproduce and distribute copies of this Article in any format at or below cost, for educational purposes, so long as each copy identifies the author, provides a citation to the Notre Dame Law Review, and in- cludes this provision in the copyright notice. * Frank and Bernice J. Greenberg Professor of Law, University of Chicago. This re- search was supported by the Frank J. Cicero Fund. I am grateful to the editors for their careful work on this article. 1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most