About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

4 Stetson Bus. L. Rev. [i] (2024)

handle is hein.journals/setnbisr4 and id is 1 raw text is: 



STETSON BUSINESS LAW REVIEW


           VOLUME 4                              FALL   2024                             ISSUE 1


OPEN ISSUE


ARTICLES

Tempering  Expectations:
Restraint in a Time of Corporate Political Activism-
Allowable Political Activity for § 501(c)(3) Tax-Exempt Organizations                   Kyle Ridgeway

        America is in an age of corporate political activity. However, § 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations in
        the United States are unable to engage in the same political activities as their for-profit counterparts.
        Why  do entities organized and operated exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, testing for
        public safety, literary, or educational purposes ... or for the prevention of cruelty to children or animals
        have more limits on their political engagement than their taxed for-profit peers? This Article seeks to
        provide an answer through a mix of both practical and theoretical analysis of the allowable political
        activity of § 501(c)(3) organizations. The Author examines the history of restricting the political
        activities of § 501(c)(3) organizations, presents an analysis of the current legal and regulatory
        framework  of allowable political activity, and provides a discussion of alternative organizational
        structure and entity formation that allow for greater political activity for tax-exempt entities. Finally,
        the Article highlights potential changes to the Internal Revenue Code that would allow for greater
        political engagement by non-profit organizations.

Democratizing the Family Trust Company                                           John F  DeStefano, Jr.      23

        Family trust companies (FTCs) offer an innovative alternative to traditional fiduciary structures for
        managing  family legacies through private express trusts. However, their benefits remain largely
        confined to families of substantial wealth. This article explores the economic utility of FTCs and reviews
        Florida's statutory framework as a  case study -   covering corporate governance, capitalization
        thresholds, and compliance  obligations -  to identify pathways  for broadening  access without
        compromising  trust law integrity. It suggests that reasonable reforms (tiered compliance models or
        exemptions  for small FTCs) aimed  at  reducing transaction costs, encouraging adoption, and
        democratizing FTC benefits, would produce a net social benefit by promoting innovation and growth in
        the fiduciary services industry, enhancing intergenerational economic mobility, and mitigating existing
        systemic inequities in private wealth governance.

Extension of 1933 Act Section 11 Tracing Requirement to Direct Listing:
A Moral Hazard                                                                   Kenneth L. MacRitchie      63

       For many  years, plaintiffs in 1933 Act Section 11 litigation have been subject to a judicially imposed
       tracing requirement, to trace ownership of their securities back to the sellers under the 1933 Act
       registration statement. In 2018, the SEC approved NYSE and NASDAQ   rules to permit direct listings
       of securities, i.e. the securities commence trading without any underwriter. On June 1, 2023, in Slack
       Technologies v. Pirani, the U.S. Supreme   Court held  that the Section 11  tracing requirement
       encompasses direct listed securities. This Article argues that inclusion of direct listed securities in the
       Section 11 tracing requirement creates a moral hazard, in that issuers are incentivized to conduct direct
       listings to evade Section 11 liability.

Clawing Back Ponzi Schemes: A Vital Examination of
Ponzi Schemes, Clawbacks, and the Ponzi Scheme Presumption                     Cooper Cade Zimmerman        115

       Ponzi schemes have plagued the world for nearly two centuries, resulting in massive gains for some and
       tragic losses for others. For those who suffer losses-the Ponzi scheme losers-hope may be found
       through operation of the clawback processes, a creature of the Bankruptcy Code (the Code), state
       Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Acts, and Securities Investor Protection Act (SIPA). Of course, given that
       there are losers in relation to Ponzi schemes, there must naturally be winners. Underlying the purpose
       of clawback actions, these innocent winners in a Ponzi scheme should not, as a matter of equity, be
       permitted to enjoy an advantage over later investors who were not so lucky as to profit. Those winners,
       generally defined as investors who have received payments in excess of their investment, are subject to

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most