About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

20 Roman Legal Trad. 1 (2024)

handle is hein.journals/rltrad20 and id is 1 raw text is: 







Roman Precursors of Modern Human Rights
Doctrine: Cicero and Tertullian



By Bruce W.  Frier*


Abstract -  The modern   theory of Human   Rights, as  developed
especially since 1948  by the  United Nations  in the  Universal
Declaration of Human   Rights  and its successors, treats Human
Rights as derived from an  inherent Human   Dignity. Two Roman
sources have been held to anticipate both of these ideas: Cicero, De
Officiis 1.105-107,  for the  concept  of Human Dignity; and
Tertullian, Ad  Scapulam   2.2, for a resulting Human   Right to
freedom of religion. This paper discusses the extent to which these
sources do in fact represent precursors. I suggest that, although the
evidence is admittedly  less than robust, both the  modern  con-
ceptions may well have originated in the philosophy of the Middle
Stoa (ca. 150-50 BCE). My  conclusion discusses the more general
problem  of how important ethical ideas such as these originate and
come  to inform moral discourse.


The  first part of this paper provides a brief, rather simplified
account  of the  intellectual structure of modern  International
Human   Rights theory as it emerged during  and after the United
Nations adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in
1948.1 The   entire intellectual substructure of Human Rights

       Professor Emeritus of Classics and Roman Law, the University of
Michigan. I must thank my law colleagues Caroline Humfress, Christopher
McCrudden, and Steven Ratner, and Victor Caston of the Michigan Depart-
ment of Philosophy, as well as Brad Inwood of Yale University Philosophy
and Classics, and Benjamin Straumann of the University of Zurich history
department, for their generous and invaluable help in helping me learn
about a most complex area of legal history. All translations are my own,
except as indicated.
    1  The purpose of this simplified account is mainly to establish a
paradigm against which the scattered ancient sources can be understood
and evaluated. For a much richer summary of modern views on Human
Dignity and Human  Rights, see C. McCrudden, Human Dignity, in C.



Roman Legal Tradition, 20 (2024), 1-42. ISSN 1943-6483. Published by the Ames Foundation
at the Harvard Law School and the Alan Rodger Endowment at the University of Glasgow. This
work is licensed under Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0. Copyright© 2024 by Bruce
W. Frier. romanlegaltradition.org. DOI 10.55740/2024.1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most