About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

92 Fordham L. Rev. Online 1 (2024)

handle is hein.journals/resgest14 and id is 1 raw text is: BRUENAS HELLER: TEXT, HISTORY, AND TRADITION IN THE LOWER COURTS Leo Bernabei* The Constitution and conventional wisdom suggest that lower courts must follow the most persuasive interpretations of US. Supreme Court precedent. But that does not always happen. Scholars recognize judicial underenforcement of Supreme Court precedent in several fields. This Essay contributes to this scholarship by analyzing lower court applications of New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. Bruen, in which the Supreme Court held that irearm laws must be consistent with the nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation. The lower courts vary widely in their approaches to analyzing gun laws under this standard. On one end, a small handful of courts has required near historical twins or tight analogues to uphold challenged regulations. Other courts feel comfortable upholding modern gun laws based on historical enactments that are only remotely analogous. Finally, some courts have avoided a historical inquiry entirely by fashioning a Bruen Step Zero or by relying on pre-Bruen circuit precedent that they find to be binding. One impetus for Bruen was judicial underenforcement of the Second Amendment in the decade following District of Columbia v. Heller. Whether Bruen will experience the same fate remains to be seen. Accordingly, to ensure that lower courts properly enforce Second Amendment claims, this Essay suggests that the Supreme Court clarify the level of generality that Bruen requires. IN TR O D U CTIO N ................................................................................ . . 2 I. HELLER AND ITS PROGENY........................................................... 5 A. Pre-Heller Second Amendment Jurisprudence.....................5 B. The Heller Decision and Its Test ...................................... 7 C. Lower Court Applications of Heller ................................. 9 1. Assault W eapon Bans......................................... . 10 2. Crim inal Defendants ............................................. . 11 II. NEW YORK STATE RIFLE & PISTOL ASSOCIATION V. BRUEN............. 12 * J.D. Candidate, 2024, Fordham University School of Law; B.A., 2021, Fordham University. I am grateful to George Mocsary and Dave Kopel for comments and to my fellow Fordham Law Review members for their fantastic editing. Thank you to my family for their constant love and support. 1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most