About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

2020 Pepp. L. Rev. Ann. 1 (2020)

handle is hein.journals/pnelwrwan2020 and id is 1 raw text is: 












                      Magic Words and Original

          Understanding: An Amplified Clear

            Statement Rule to Abrogate Tribal

                                    Sovereign Immunity



    There is not one example in all of history where the Supreme Court has
found that Congress intended to abrogate tribal sovereign immunity without
expressly mentioning Indian tribes somewhere in the statute.i


                                Abstract

    The Indian plenary power doctrine-an invention of the late nineteenth-
century Supreme Court  grants Congress exclusive authority to legislate with
respect to Indian tribes, including the ability to abrogate tribal sovereign
immunity.  Under current doctrine, Congress must unequivocally express
its intent to abrogate the sovereign immunity of Indian tribes with explicit
legislation.  Circuit courts tasked with applying this standard have split on
the level of textual specificity required to strip tribes of their immunity.
Employing  the tools of statutory construction, courts are divided over whether
the term 'domestic government, 'as found in Section 106 of the Bankruptcy
Code,  unequivocally covers Indian tribes. Because the purported power
Congress exercises to abrogate tribal sovereign immunity is constitutionally
dubious as an original matter, this Article contends that courts should only
find abrogation when Congress leaves no doubt that it is acting in reliance
upon that power. Specifically, the persuasive originalist critique ofthe Indian
plenary power doctrine's historical incorrectness licenses the adoption of a
magic  words clear statement rule. Under the proposed rule, Congress must
expressly mention 'Indian tribes' or a closely associated term somewhere in
the statute's text to effectuate the abrogation of a tribe's sovereign immunity.


   1. Meyers v. Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wis., 836 F.3d 818, 824 (7th Cir. 2016) (quoting In re
Greektown Holdings, LLC, 532 B.R. 680, 693 (E.D. Mich. 2015)).


1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most