About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

28 Potchefstroom Elec. L.J. 1 (2025)

handle is hein.journals/per28 and id is 1 raw text is: PE-R Pioneer in peer-reviewed, open access online law publications Author Henry Lerm Affiliation Nelson Mandela University, South Africa Email henry.lerm0l@gmail.com Date Submitted 22 January 2023 Date Revised 1 October 2024 Date Accepted 1 October 2024 Date Published 10 March 2025 Editor Prof Tumi Mmusinyane Journal Editor Prof Wian Erlank How to cite this contribution Lerm H When the Inherent Authority of the High Court Trumps Parental Authority in Medical Decision-Making Involving the Withdrawal of Life Support Treatment Affecting Minor Children and their Parents PER/PELJ 2024(27) - DOI http://dxdoiorg/ 0.1 71 59/1727- 3781 /2025/v28i0a1 5475 Copyright DOI http://dx.doi.org/l0.17159/1727- 3781/2025/v2810a15475 Abstract Judges are often up against very grave cases when they have to decide whether to order the withdrawal of life support from children who are seriously ill or in a vegetative state. What is more, medical practitioners attending to the medical care of the child affected, believe that clinically it would be in the best interest of the child that his or her life should be terminated. Any continued medical treatment would be futile. The parent(s) on the other hand do not agree with the medical team. Because the parties involved cannot reach agreement the dispute is consequently referred to the High Court. It is then up to the court to make the final decision. In this triad, some of the fundamental legal issues to be decided, include: who should have the final say over the withdrawal of life support treatment for minor patient? What criteria does the court use in resolving the dispute between the parties? This article provides a critical insight into when the High Court's inherent authority trumps parental authority in end-of-life decision making affecting minor children. What will become apparent is that the South African High Court has only sporadically been asked to exercise their inherent authority to interfere with a parent's decision-making power when, because of religious reasons, parents refuse to consent to their children being exposed to blood transfusions. Here, the High Court has often come to the rescue of children by adopting an orthodox approach. The court will firstly, in search of the welfare of the child, exercise its authority as upper guardian of children. Secondly, the court will search for the welfare of the child under the rubric of what is in the best interest of the child. The South African High Court, unlike its English counter-part, has not been exposed to cases dealing with end-of-life decisions involving children. What is called for is for the South African courts to develop its own jurisprudence. A likely starting point would be for consideration to be given to South African domestic law, including the Constitution, the common law and customary law infusing African jurisprudence. To this end, the South African High Court is also urged to consider the well-developed criteria found in the English cases. But, before the parties engage in litigation, where possible, mediation should be attempted. Keywords Best interests of the minor child; blood transfusions; withdrawing life support; end-of-life decision making; consent; comparative law; constitutional imperatives; foreign law; African jurisprudence; Children's Act; inherent authority of the High Court; mediation before litigation; sensitivity training.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most