About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

114 Pol. Sci. Q. 1 (1999-2000)

handle is hein.journals/pclscceqry114 and id is 1 raw text is: 



            Defining Moment:

            The Threat and Use of Force in American

            Foreign Policy










                                            BARRY M. BLECHMAN
                                      TAMARA COFMAN WITTES

            The use of military force has been a difficult subject for American
leaders for three decades. Ever since the failure of American policy and mili-
tary power in Vietnam, it has been hard for U.S. policy makers to gain domestic
support for the use of force as an instrument of statecraft. U.S. military power
has been exercised throughout this thirty-year period, but both threats of its use
and the actual conduct of military operations have usually been controversial,
turned to reluctantly, and marked by significant failures as well as successes.
The  American  armed  forces are large, superbly trained, fully prepared, and
technologically advanced. Since the demise of the Soviet Union, U.S. forces
are without question the most powerful by far on the face of the earth. Their
competence,  lethality, and global reach have been demonstrated  time  and
again. Yet with rare exceptions, U.S. policy makers have found it difficult to
achieve their objectives by threats alone. Often they have had to use force-
even if only in limited ways-to add strength to the words of diplomats. And
at more times than is desirable, the failures of threats and limited demonstrative
uses of military power have confronted U.S. presidents with difficult choices
between  retreat and all-out military actions intended to achieve objectives by
the force of arms alone.
    In the 1980s, most U.S. military leaders and many politicians and policy
makers  drew a strong conclusion from the failure of U.S. policy in Vietnam.


BARRY  M. BLECHMAN   is the founder and president of DFI International and the cofounder and
chairman of the Henry L. Stimson Center. This article was prepared initially for the National Academy
of Sciences. TAMARA COFMAN WITTES is a university fellow and doctoral candidate in the De-
partment of Government, Georgetown University. Her dissertation concerns techniques for ethnic
conflict resolution. She also writes on coercive diplomacy and U.S. counterterrorism policy.


Political Science Quarterly Volume 114 Number 1 1999


1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most