About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

113 Pol. Sci. Q. 1 (1998-1999)

handle is hein.journals/pclscceqry113 and id is 1 raw text is: 



The War Powers Resolution:


            Time to Say Goodbye










                                                       LOUIS FISHER
                                             DAVID GRAY ADLER

            The War  Powers  Resolution (WPR)  of 1973 is generally consid-
ered the high-water mark of congressional reassertion in national security af-
fairs. In fact, it was ill conceived and badly compromised from the start, replete
with tortured ambiguity and self-contradiction. The net result was to legalize a
scope for independent  presidential power that would  have astonished the
Framers, who  vested the power to initiate hostilities exclusively in Congress.
The resolution, however, grants to the president unbridled discretion to go to
war as he deems  necessary against anyone, anytime, anywhere,  for at least
ninety days. As Arthur Schlesinger Jr. has observed, before the passage of the
resolution, unilateral presidential war was a matter of usurpation. Now, at least
for the first ninety days, it was a matter of law.'
    Implementation  of the War Powers Resolution has revealed further defi-
ciencies. After occupying Haiti, the Clinton administration actually cited the
resolution favorably as another weapon to add to its ever-expanding arsenal
of claims for presidential warmaking power. After nearly twenty-five years of
experience, it would be  better for both branches-and for constitutional
government-to   repeal the War Powers Resolution and rely on traditional po-
litical pressures and the regular system of checks and balances, including im-
peachment. There is some risk that repeal might indirectly signal a reduced role
for Congress, but that role has reached a minimal level anyway, in part because
of the War Powers  Resolution. Over the long term, outright repeal would be
less risky than continuing along the present path.

  'Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., The Imperial Presidency (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1989), 434-35.

LOUIS FISHER is senior specialist in separation of powers at the Congressional Research Service of
the Library of Congress. His most recent book is Presidential War Power. DAVID GRAY ADLER
is professor of political science at Idaho State University. His most recent book, which he edited with
Larry N. George, is The Constitution and the Conduct of American Foreign Policy.


Political Science Quarterly  Volume 113  Number 1  1998


1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most