About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

100 Pol. Sci. Q. 1 (1985-1986)

handle is hein.journals/pclscceqry100 and id is 1 raw text is: 








              On Mandates, Realignments, and

              the 1984 Presidential Election











                                              EVERETT CARLL LADD


              After almost every presidential election, politicians and pundits
try to discern what voters really intended to say. Of course, the most important
thing about an  election is its actual outcome, who got elected. But next come
the competing  efforts to interpret the outcome in a way favorable to one side or
the other. This is neither surprising nor disturbing. Various groups and interests
have stakes in the long-term course of American  public policy; naturally, they
choose to relate election outcomes to what they want that course to be. This con-
tinuing policy struggle gets expressed by the idea of a mandate. Who  got a
mandate  from  the voters to do what?
  In the pages of this journal four years ago, I discussed the Reagan-Carter elec-
tion against the backdrop of the argument  about what  kind of a mandate  the
new  president had won.I Rejecting both the view that Ronald Reagan's  victory
was the culmination  of a coherent swing to the right and the view that it was
nothing more  than the rejection of Jimmy  Carter, an unpopular  incumbent,  I
maintained  that Reagan had received a positive mandate to take the country in
a new  direction-but  that the mandate was  necessarily brittle.
  Its lack of firmness had three related sources: First, a more highly educated
electorate, in the personality-emphasizing world of TV-centered electioneering,

  I Everett Ladd, The Brittle Mandate: Electoral Dealignment and the 1980 Presidential Election,
Political Science Quarterly, (Spring 1981): 1.

EVERETT  CARLL  LADD  is professor of political science and director of the Institute for Social
Inquiry at the University of Connecticut and executive director of The Roper Center for Public
Opinion Research. He is the author of numerous books and articles on American political parties
and elections, including Where HaveAll the Voters Gone? The Fracturing ofAmerica's PoliticalPar-
ties, 2nd. ed., rev., and The American Polity: The People and Their Government.


Political Sciencse Quairterly Volume Too) Nurnber I 5pring 1985

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most