About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

52 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L. 1 (2021)

handle is hein.journals/ocdev52 and id is 1 raw text is: OCEAN DEVELOPMENT & INTERNATIONAL LAW
2021, VOL. 52, NO. 1, 1-19                                                  (        ayo    &Fani
https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2020.1835026                                       Taylor & Francis Group
The Genesis of Article 234 of the UNCLOS
Jan Jakub Solski
Norwegian Center for the Law of the Sea, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway
ABSTRACT                                                                    ARTICLE HISTORY
Article 234 is exceptional regarding its wording and placement in the       Received 21 May 2020
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), as well as        Accepted 26 June 2020
in its historical background. The Arctic provision has given rise to diver-
gent interpretations regarding the conditions for invoking it, the limita-  KEYWORDS
tions on the authority under Article 234, and its spatial scope of           Actic rticle 2; Northerr
application. It has served as a justification for specific legislation adopted  Passage (NWP); UNCLOS
by Canada and Russia that has been opposed by the United States. The
article, describes as a textbook example of finding a compromise in
international treaty negotiations, was negotiated directly and privately,
among these three states during the Third United Nations Conference
on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS Ill). This article describes the historical
background to Article 234 and sheds new light on the negotiating pro-
cess that led to the adoption of the provision.
Introduction
Article 234 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)1 was
negotiated directly and privately, among Canada, the United States, and the USSR, dur-
ing the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS III). It has
been described as both a textbook example of finding a compromise in international
treaty negotiations2 and a witch's brew, a caldron of legal uncertainty which could be
stirred in favor of either the coastal or shipping state.3
CONTACT Dr. Jan Jakub Solski    Jan.solski@uit.no  Norwegian Center for the Law of the Sea, UiT-The Arctic
University of Norway, Troms0, Norway.
' United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (adopted 10 December 1982, entered into force 16 November
1994), 1833 UNTS 3 UNCLOS, Art 234:
Coastal States have the right to adopt and enforce non-discriminatory laws and regulations for the prevention,
reduction, and control of marine pollution from vessels in ice-covered areas within the limits of the exclusive economic zone,
where particularly severe climatic conditions and the presence of ice covering such areas for most of the year create
obstructions or exceptional hazards to navigation, and pollution of the marine environment could cause major harm to or
irreversible disturbance of the ecological balance. Such laws and regulations shall have due regard to navigation and the
protection and preservation of the marine environment based on the best available scientific evidence.
2 K. Bartenstein, The Arctic Exception in the Law of the Sea Convention: A Contribution to Safer Navigation in the
Northwest Passage? (2011) 42 Ocean Development and International Law 22, 27.
3 C. Lamson and D. VanderZwaag, Arctic Waters: Needs and Options for Canadian-American Cooperation (1987) 18
Ocean Development and International Law 49, 81.
This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.
C 2021 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most