About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

99 N.Y.U. L. Rev. Online 1 (2024)

handle is hein.journals/nyulro99 and id is 1 raw text is: 













   SUING FOR A BIT(COIN) OF JUSTICE-CLASS

 ACTIONS AND THE ROLE OF TECHNOLOGY IN

 MORRISON EXTRATERRITORIALITY ANALYSIS


                              EDMUND H.S. BROSE*

    In the wild west of crypto, courts are slowly coming to realize that crypto assets present
    novel questions of law that challenge core assumptions of United States securities law.
    This online feature argues that a more comprehensive understanding of blockchain
    technology counsels courts to apply the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws
    extraterritorially. Such a move will economize judicial capacity, deter fraud, and protect
    U.S. investors. Instead of relying on a nodular analysis, courts should look to the policy
    rationales of the Court's Morrison decision, as well as the Second Circuit's Absolute
    Activist opinion, to lead out of the jurisdictional morass of locating crypto transactions.
    In addition to relying on enumerated factual allegations laid out in Absolute Activist,
    courts should find that transactions occur where the parties are physically located rather
    than where the physical structure that underlies the crypto network is located. Further,
    they should utilize a plus factor of whether the company has marketed the product into a
    jurisdiction. As a result, courts can dispense with legal fiction and preserve the aims of
    the Morrison ruling. As private class actions only continue to increase in number, the
    time to develop a consistent and encompassing rationale is now.



























    * Copyright © 2024 by Edmund Brose. J.D., 2023, New York University School of Law; B.A.,
2017, Columbia University. I am once again deeply grateful to Judge Jed. S. Rakoff for inspiring
an interest in securities litigation and class actions, as well as his thoughtful comments on the piece.
Thank you also to Professor David Reiss for his thoughts on an early draft. Thank you also to the
phenomenal Online Editors of the New York University Law Review, especially Colin Heath and
Soomin Shin for her careful and incisive edits. I am always grateful for my loving family, especially
my parents, who endured endless but important conversations around this complicated topic.


1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most