About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

13 Kathmandu Sch. L. Rev. 1 (2024)

handle is hein.journals/kslr13 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                                                               Kathmandu School of Law Review (KSLR),
                                                                             Volume 13, 2024, pp 1-33
                                                                https://doi.org/10.46985/kslr.vl3i1.2232
                                                                                      © KSLR, 2024





     Need for Urgent Reforms in the United Nations Security

             Council: Pathways to Equitable Representation

                                                                      Prof. (Dr.) Yubaraj Sangroula*

                                            Abstract

          The United Nations (UN) has faced groning critiism over time for structural neffdendes, lack
          of transparency, and the underrepresentation of diverse voices in critical dedsion-making processes.
          This article examines the necessity of reforming the United Nations Security Counil (UNSC)
          with a focus on the controversial veto power wielded by the permanent members (PS). The veto
          system, has contributed to imbalanced dedision-making, undermining the priniples of equitable
          representation, espedally for smaller and landlocked nations Like Nepal Analysing the historical
          and contemporary practices of the Security Counil, the article explores the legal and structural
          challenges posed by the veto system, its role in perpetuating Western hegemony, and its impact on
          globalpeace and security. Itproposes actionable reforms, including the professionalization of Counil
          representation, the inclusion of regional players in dedision-making, and the decentralization of
          UNfunctions.

          Keywords:   United Nations, Veto power, UN Security Counil.




I.   Introduction: Failure of the League of Nations

The  League   of Nations  failed due  to the uncontrolled,  unlimited, and  inhuman   ambition  of
European   nations to colonize  the world.1 The  organization was  established with a sense that it
would  provide a forum  where  nations could negotiate and settle their disputes but it failed grossly
in its purpose. During  the  1920s, the League  appeared   as a modest  platform  of international
diplomacy,  where  a series of negotiations  and discussions  occurred  and some   of them  ended
successfully, authoring and  adopting some   multilateral conventions, thus adding to the strength
of  international law. Yet, the League of Nations  did not  work  badly in its inception and failed
in the days  to come.  By  December 1920, 48 states had signed the League Covenant and all
of them  pledged  to eliminate aggression.  A series of disputes-between Germany and Poland
over Upper   Silesia, between Italy and Greece, and between  Greece  and Bulgaria-were resolved



     Prof. (Dr.) Yubaraj Sangroula is the Executive Director, Kathmandu School of Law. The author can be reached at
     yubaraj.sangroula@ksl.edu.np
1    'The League of Nations Overview', IGCSE History, available at http://igcsehistory.weebly.com/ the-league-of-na-
     tions.html, accessed on 29 April 2018.


1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most