About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

33 J. Soc. Welfare & Fam. L. 1 (2011)

handle is hein.journals/jnlosclwl33 and id is 1 raw text is: 



Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law                                     Routiedge
Vol. 33, No. 1, March 2011, 1-2




                                  EDITORIAL

                                  Helen  Stalford

This first issue of the Journal for 2011 presents the usual mix of UK and international
perspectives on social welfare and family law.
    We  are delighted, first of all, to feature three papers reflecting on the high-profile
Supreme  Court case of Radmacher v Granatino. The decision attracted considerable media
attention following its pronouncement in October 2010 with the Law Lords determining
that decisive weight should be attached to an ante-nuptial agreement concluded between a
wealthy heiress and her rather less wealthy husband some eight years later when the couple
divorced. While the decision was applauded by some  for favouring adults' autonomy to
contract out  of the  fundamental  principles of equality  and mutual  responsibility
underpinning matrimonial law, the decision is noted as much for the lone dissenting voice
of Lady Hale. We  are privileged to capture her perspective here on the broader impact of
the Radmacher   decision on our understanding of marriage and on the extent to which
private bargaining can  and  should replace judicial discretion. Brenda Hale's paper
questions, in particular, whether rigid adherence to the former can really produce the 'fair',
'equal' outcomes that family law has fought so hard to achieve over the last two centuries.
    Such questions are pursued further by Brigitte Clark and Sharon Thompson in their
contributions which take us through the finer details of the Court's deliberations, and
particularly how 'fairness' was presented as the key notion by which the enforceability of
an ante-nuptial agreement should be decided. Clark and  Thompson   share Lady Hale's
concerns as to whether any ante-nuptial agreement can be exhaustively fair; some aspects
might be  fairer than others, depending on the circumstances of the individuals when it
comes  to be applied. Indeed, recognition of the panoply of factors - many of which cannot
be quantified in economic or commercial terms  - that need to be taken into account in
determining what  is the fairest way to divide property in any given case is what has
underpinned  the exercise of judicial discretion up until now. Radmacher is, therefore,
presented as a retrograde step in the pursuit of flexibility, genuine fairness and equality in
regulating private relationships.
    Continuing with the theme of equality and fairness, Michelle Weldon-Johns' article
speculates on  the potential impact of  the Additional Paternity Leave  Regulations,
scheduled to come into effect in the UK in April 2011. These Regulations aim to stimulate
a more  equitable division of childcare responsibilities between parents by enabling
mothers to transfer parental leave rights to fathers and giving working fathers the right to
request more flexible working arrangements. The author's analysis of the new measures
reveals some rather disappointing limitations insofar as the extent to which fathers can
benefit from them depends on the working arrangements and choices of the mother. In that
sense, and in stark contrast to other jurisdictions' more gender-neutral approach, they
reinforce the peripheral role of men in determining and providing care for their children.
    The final two articles shift our attention to other family law regimes. Sayed Sikandar
Shah haneef offers a broad analysis of Islamic family law in Malaysia, and specifically the
disenfranchising effects of the laws on polygamy, divorce and parental responsibility on

ISSN 0964-9069 print/ISSN 1469-9621 online
© 2011 Taylor & Francis
DOI: 10.1080/09649069.2011.571465
http://www.informaworld.com

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most