About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

30 J. Soc. Welfare & Fam. L. 1 (2008)

handle is hein.journals/jnlosclwl30 and id is 1 raw text is: 


Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law                                R
Vol. 30, No. 1, March 2008, 1-2




                                 EDITORIAL


This first issue of the journal for 2008 starts on a significant note. It is my sad task to
announce  the departure of Christina Lyon from the Joint Editorship. Christina has
provided invaluable leadership to the journal over many years and will be very much
missed. However, she has agreed to stay on as a member of the Advisory Board and
will be an extremely welcome addition in that capacity. A fuller appreciation of her
work  will appear in a later edition of the journal. There are two pieces of good news
in this, however. The first of these is that the reason for Christina's departure was her
appointment  as  a Circuit Judge in  November   2007. Obviously,  such a role is
incompatible with the public profile that goes with editorship of a journal. I and, I
am  sure, everyone else associated with the journal wish her all the best in that new
role. The other piece of good news is that Dr Helen Stalford, of the Liverpool Law
School, has agreed to act as Christina's successor. Helen's specialism in European
law will be a significant asset in maintaining the international side of the journal's
coverage and I look forward to working  with her.
    For this issue of the journal, we have articles and cases covering the range of our
usual concerns and some relatively new ones. Our first article, by Israel Doron of the
University of Haifa in Israel, along with colleagues, should be of particular interest
to social work practitioners and academics in other countries. The analysis by the
authors of the impact of the legislative professionalisation of social workers of social
workers in Israel since 1996 sheds an intriguing light on how social workers have
responded  to this development. As  the authors point out, this development  has
interesting parallels with the legislative regulation of social work that has taken place
in such countries as the UK and New   Zealand during a similar time frame. In the
case of their own study, the authors found that legal regulation had been broadly
welcomed  by social workers. Defining a profession and regulating entry to it is, of
course, usually welcomed  by  those who  manage   be defined as members   of the
profession. In that sense, the authors' findings are not surprising. However, the story
is not as simple as that. Professionalisation does not always equal progress and the
authors note both 'anti-professionalism' arguments and advocates, and the possible
implications of such professionalisation for the welfare of clients.
    The  second  article, by  Malcolm   Voyce   of  McQuarrie   University  Law
Department  in Australia, considers an issue that has cropped up, in one form or
another, in various past issues of this journal. The treatment of cohabitation and, in
this case, 'marriage-like relationships' raises difficult legal and moral issues for the
state. The desire to maintain a distinction between marriage as a legal state and other
forms  of relationship often clashes with  a desire to  treat a wide  variety of
relationships either equally or with moral neutrality (or both). In the Australian
context, the key focus of attention is on the way in which having the status of being
in a 'marriage-like relationship' affects the relationship of women to the benefits
system. The  complex  and varied status of such relationships presents significant
ISSN 0964-9069 print/ISSN 1469-9621 online
© 2008 Taylor & Francis
DOI: 10.1080/09649060802169732
http://www.informaworld.com

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most