About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

16 J. Soc. Welfare & Fam. L. 1 (1994)

handle is hein.journals/jnlosclwl16 and id is 1 raw text is: 







Editorial

This issue, No. 1, 1994, marks a watershed in the history of the Journal of
Social Welfare &  Family Law,  since it is the first to be published by
Routledge  following the transfer of ownership from Sweet & Maxwell of
which regular readers will be aware, both from our editorial in the final issue
of 1993 and from the publicity material which subscribers have received. As
Joint General Editors, we and our team of Section Editors warmly welcome
and support this change and this edition reflects our determination, which is
shared by our new publishers, to continue to provide our readers with the
coverage to which they have been accustomed, both in terms of the quality
and the range of material published. We are also, however, greatly looking
forward to the potential for making further improvements which has been
created by the move to a quarterly publication with an increased number of
pages, and as Editors we should welcome any comments which our readers
might have about these important changes.
  As  the Journal goes to press, a number of important issues are at the
forefront of current debate. The White Paper on adoption law, published on
3 November  1993, proposes some of the most sweeping changes in this area
of law for two decades. In doing so, it attempts to respond to a number of
issues which have been the subject of much recent discussion and public
concern. Proposals are made to streamline the procedures for the adoption
of children from abroad, an issue highlighted by recent cases involving
attempts to adopt children from Romania and other countries torn by civil
war and  strife. In doing so, the White Paper reinforces the principle of
mutual recognition of adoption orders and practices. It is, however, critical
of local authorities who appear to have given too much weight to differences
in ethnic, cultural, or racial backgrounds when assessing the suitability of
prospective adopters and in so doing have prevented couples from adopting
children of a different race. Authorities are also urged to be more flexible in
considering applications to adopt: from older couples, although the Secre-
tary of State appears to have been  ignorant of recent case-law (for a
discussion of which see R. Sandland, Journal of Social Welfare & Family
Law,  No. 5, 1993: 321-332) when introducing the White Paper by insisting
that there was no question of gay couples being allowed to adopt.
  Another  issue currently attracting much concern and comment is that of
the activities and impact of the Child Support Agency, set up in April 1993 as
a result of the Child Support Act, which are currently being reviewed by the
Social Security Select Committee of the House  of Commons.  In conse-
quence, a number  of important practical issues are being raised, including:
the priorities established by the Agency; the design of the formula for
calculating payments; the cost of :DNA tests to determine paternity and the
implications of this for the cost-effectiveness of pursuing cases where the
fathers are denying paternity; and the impact which the combined effect of
these is having on fathers, mothers and their families. In the process,


1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most