About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

7 J. Human Trafficking 1 (2021)

handle is hein.journals/jhtrafk7 and id is 1 raw text is: JOURNAL OF HUMAN TRAFFICKING                                                     outledge
2021, VOL. 7, NO. 1, 1-13                                                          u    d
https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2019.1660952                                  Taylor & Francis Group
On the Unreliability of Multiple Systems Estimation for Estimating
the Number of Potential Victims of Modern Slavery in the UK
John Whiteheada, James Jacksona, Alex Balch', and Brian Francisa
aDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK; 'Department of Politics, University of
Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
ABSTRACT                                                               KEYWORDS
Accurate records of victims of modern slavery identified by various agencies  Estimating numbers of
allow investigators to compare different jurisdictions, track fluctuations in  potential victims of modern
prevalence over time and evaluate preventative interventions. As well as  slavery; multiple systems
enumerating those victims known to agencies, it would be desirable to know  estimation; potential victims
how many are working undetected under conditions of modern slavery and  of modern slavery
thus deduce the total number involved. To estimate the number of undetected
potential victims of modern slavery in the UK, Bales, Hesketh and Silverman
applied the method of Multiple Systems Estimation. Their approach involves
fitting a statistical model to data listing victims detected by different agencies.
In doing so, (a) they assume that various terms in the model are equal to 1, and
(b) they only include terms not assumed to be 1 if they achieve statistical
significance. In this paper, simulated datasets with known properties are used
to show that if (a) is valid then (b) leads to substantial overstatement of the
reliability of the estimates computed, and that if (a) is not valid then the
estimation procedure is totally unsound. We conclude that Multiple Systems
Estimation is not a suitable method for estimating numbers of potential victims
of modern slavery.
Introduction
The most robust estimate to date of the scale of modern slavery in the UK was produced by the
Home Office in 2014. The estimate suggested that there were between 10,000 and 13,000 potential
victims of modern slavery in the UK in 2013 (Home Office, 2018, p. 4). This statement is made in
the 2018 UK Annual Report on Modern Slavery, published in October of that year (Home Office,
2018). In the report, potential victims of modern slavery are taken to be people who have been
identified and referred to as possibly having worked under conditions of modern slavery, and this
includes both those whose victim status is eventually confirmed and those for whom it is not. For
brevity, such people will be referred to as pvoms. In this paper we will show that the figures quoted
above are unreliable, and that the method used to derive them is inappropriate.
The range (10 000, 13 000) quoted in the Home Office report is drawn from a series of analyses
presented by Bales, Hesketh, and Silverman (2015) (henceforth BHS) who deduced these figures
using a method known as Multiple Systems Estimation (MSE). MSE is a generalization of the
method of capture-recapture, used (for example) to estimate fish populations over a century ago
(Goudie & Goudie, 2007; Manrique-Vallier, Price, & Gohdes, 2013). In such an application, a sample
of fish from a stable population would be caught, counted, marked, and thrown back into the water.
Later, a second sample would be caught, and the numbers of marked and unmarked fish would be
CONTACT John Whitehead 0 j.whitehead@lancaster.ac.uk (D Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University,
Lancaster LA1 4YF, UK
This article was originally published with errors, which have now been corrected in the online version. Please see Correction
(http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2020.1724650)
© 2019 Taylor & Francis

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most