About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

34 Hitotsubashi J.L. & Pol. 1 (2006)

handle is hein.journals/hbijllw34 and id is 1 raw text is: 







Hitotsubashi Journal of Law and Politics 34 (2006), pp.1-14. C Hitotsubashi University


   AN AGREEMENT SUPERSEDES THE LAW, AND AMICABLE
                  SETTLEMENT A COURT JUDGEMENT
        DISPUTES AND LITIGATION IN MEDIEVAL EUROPE*


                                SUSUMU YAMAUCHI



                                     Introduction

     Defining the bounds of medieval Europe, both in time and space is an almost impossible
task, and addressing the issues of disputes and litigation within that framework is a very broad
topic defying generalities. Nonetheless, recent work in this field is stimulating, and it has an
appeal that transcends  medieval European  history. This paper  summarizes  the issue by
clarifying its relation to order.
    In this paper, 'medieval' is not used to refer to the period spanning from 500 to 1500 C.
E., but a period that has little direct bearing on modern or contemporary Europe: a relatively
primitive time in which a social system ruled based on tribal relations and kinship, a social
system that was considerably advanced, beginning around the 6th century and ending around
the 12th
    Although  there is no sudden delineation marking the end of the Middle Ages, the 12th_
Century Renaissance1  marked  the beginning of a long spiritual and systemic transition to a
new  social system, as pointed out by  George  Duby  and  Aaron  Gurevich.  The issue of
litigation, of course, is relevant to the turning point in Europe, that is, the formation of a more
modern  Europe. It is from this perspective that I examine disputes and litigation in medieval
Europe.


                       I.   Iudicium   Dei: Judgement of God

    According  to van Caenegem,  in the 12th century, the methods of (legal) proof that had
ruled for years began to face a crisis. That danger was sufficient to overturn and eliminate the
method  of proving  guilt or innocence in use until then. The old system might be  called
primitive, irrational, or mystical. The highest authority was held by the judgement of God,
oaths with oath-helpers, and other such methods for asserting who is right and who is wrong,
or who  is innocent and who is guilty.2

  * This article is based on my article Doi wa Houritsu ni, Wakai wa Hanketsu ni Masaru in Rekishigakukenkyu-
kai, Hunso to Sosho no Bunkashi, Tokyo, 2000. This English version has also received financial support of
Hitotsubashi University's 21t Century COE Programme, The Centre for New European Research - Conflict
and Settlement.
   Charles Homer Haskins, Renaissance of the Twelfth Century, Harvard University Press, 1927 (reprint 1979).
   2 R. van Caenegem, The Law of Evidence in the Twelfth Century, Proceedings of the Second International
Congress of Medieval Canon Law, Vatican, 1965. Cf. Kiyonori Takahashi, 'Chuusei-toshi versus Shinpan' Ron to
Sono Parameters, in Hougaku Ronshuu 11-1, p.173ff.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most